Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

House prices drop in Scotland in real terms

Options
13567

Comments

  • chucky wrote: »
    lol - i don't think so

    but it's good to see that you go out of your way to check to even see who Thanks each and every one of Hamish's posts - you are one sad trucker :eek:

    The split second it takes to click the 'Show me >> ' button must really be a chore
  • nembot wrote: »
    I think ISTL is correct there isn't a great deal of movement either way, makes the next 6 months even more interesting ;)

    If it's anything to go by on the last two years then there's not a lot to talk about ;)
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • DaddyBear
    DaddyBear Posts: 1,208 Forumite
    So in real terms, would the average property be more expensive to buy now than a year ago?

    The answer is yes as they would actually have to pay 1.3% more or 2.0% more in Aberdeen than they did last year.
    In actual monetary terms, this means an extra £2,000 - £3,600

    If you look on a wider scal, prices are pretty stagnant at very near peak.
    no crash and no rampant HPI.


    Actually The answer is an emphatic "No".
    In real terms prices have dropped because thanks to inflation the pound in your pocket is worth 3% less than last year.
    You are confusing real and nominal.
  • lemonjelly wrote: »
    Generally, he won't reply where he is in the wrong.

    I already replied to the OP in another thread, yesterday.

    I saw no particular reason to respond in this thread, which is just blatant trolling by daddybear, yet again.

    To cut a long story short, my sig is correct. Daddybears assertion of Qaurterly YoY is also correct. His assertion of real terms losses excludes rent, and is incorrect.

    However none of this makes the slightest bit of difference, as the reality is that Aberdeen prices are still at 2007 levels. In fact, they never left 2007 levels, all the way through the "crash". They did dip back to Jan 2007 levels for two months last year, but have been healthily above that point ever since, including today.

    ISTL has a handy graph illustrating this point, and if he could post it here that would probably paint a nice easy picture for even the simplest of bears to understand.
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • Mr.Brown_4
    Mr.Brown_4 Posts: 1,109 Forumite
    However none of this makes the slightest bit of difference, as the reality is that Aberdeen prices are still at 2007 levels.
    Er Hamish, it's Feb 2010? Get with the times mate.
  • DaddyBear
    DaddyBear Posts: 1,208 Forumite
    just blatant trolling by daddybear.
    So threads based on facts and related to house prices are now deemed by you as trolling. I guess your definition of trolling is any post that disproves your fantasy.

    His assertion of real terms losses excludes rent, and is incorrect.
    House prices relative to inflation, how on earth does rent come into this?

    paint a nice easy picture for even the simplest of bears to understand.

    Ahh, no Hamish thread is complete without an insult. Lick those wounds my friend.
  • HAMISH_MCTAVISH
    HAMISH_MCTAVISH Posts: 28,592 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 25 February 2010 at 10:46PM
    DaddyBear wrote: »
    I guess your definition of trolling is any post that disproves your fantasy.
    .

    What, like this one.......



    According to the Register of Scotland......

    January 2009 Aberdeen average house price = £160,959

    December 2009 Aberdeen average house price = £172,603

    That's a 7.2% increase for the year....

    Now adjust that for inflation and choke on it, you bitter little troll....:rotfl:
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • googler
    googler Posts: 16,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    According to the Register of Scotland......

    January 2009 Aberdeen average house price = £160,959

    December 2009 Aberdeen average house price = £172,603

    That's a 7.2% increase for the year....

    Well, I choose not to adjust it for inflation, but if Aberdeen is anything like my corner of Scotland, the sales at £300k and above could have increased in number by a factor of 2 or 2.5, with no real increase in prices, and that would drag up an 'average' computed over the whole price range......

    Go to zoopla, copy/paste all the sales into a spreadsheet, and see what's happening in the various price bands..... if you have the time.
  • googler
    googler Posts: 16,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Even without the manual calcs, zoopla reports the average price paid in the last year is £169,301, over 3,842 sales.

    For the last 3 years, the average is £171,771, over 14,200 sales.

    That would seem to show that - the number of sales in the last year was below average, which will make the figures less reliable, and - if the average over the last 3 years is higher than the average in the last year, isn't that a FALL in average price....??
  • DaddyBear wrote: »
    Actually The answer is an emphatic "No".
    In real terms prices have dropped because thanks to inflation the pound in your pocket is worth 3% less than last year.
    You are confusing real and nominal.

    Reality is, that regardless of what the pound is worth, I still would have to pay more pounds to buy a property now than I would have had to last year.

    You've decided to compare the rise in house prices against the rise in inflation.
    Does this mean that you think house prices should rise more to meet inflation?

    What about comparing house price inflation to wage inflation. How does that compare?
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.