We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Who to sue??
Comments
-
onthebeach wrote: »The engineers report would have been £390+vat! if someone can do it cheaper let me know.
Intels own MTBF(Mean Time Between Failures) is 25000 hours for Q9450 (2.6 years)
Yes I have the proof it was inherently faulty. I have the temperature logs right up until it died that showed it running at 32C with a Max of 39C when playing games(70C is the limit). It was consistently within Intel's specified limits.
It was also protected against electrical spikes via a surge protector and UPS.
The extensive research was done at the library and website of HM’s Court Service.
You do realise how inaccurate cpu temperature sensors can be?0 -
But it took the previous CPU 2 yrs to failonthebeach wrote: »The motherboard works fine. I put a new CPU in and it all works fine.This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards