Unregistering a Business name at my home address?

DVardysShadow

prudryden wrote: »

I am except that jerk! Let him take out his problems on his ex-wife.

Fire_Fox wrote: »

Congratulations you just earned yourself an abuse report.

prudryden wrote: »

Don't be so childish!!!!

BitterAndTwisted wrote: »

Maybe you just earned yourself another one. Please behave, this isn't CeeBeeBees

Thanks guys for the support. By way of explanation I think, given the baseless comment about ex-wife, this might a deranged and embittered stalker from the Marriages and Relationships Board, whom I may have upset earlier today by positing a comment on a thread about separated parents taking their children on holiday. For the record, until no more than 5 minutes ago, I have had no ex wife, and I think our relationship will outlast prudryden's posting privileges.

Fire_Fox

DVardy please delete the negative description of the other party before abuse turn up to see what all the fuss is about.

DVardysShadow

Fire_Fox wrote: »

DVardy please delete the negative description of the other party before abuse turn up to see what all the fuss is about.

Thanks for the friendly advice! I have written it, so I am not going to walk away from it. I am clear it is speculative on my part, but I feel it is fair comment, given the barmy reference to me having an ex wife.

prudryden

You picked on two posts that were trying to answer the OP and you attempted to be clever with childish remarks about their posts. Your comments were not aimed at helping the OP at all just showing up the others. There was no reason for it and my earlier comments are probably close to the truth. I have always held Fire Fox comments in regard, but his support of you in this case is surprising.

DVardysShadow

prudryden wrote: »

You picked on two posts that were trying to answer the OP and you attempted to be clever with childish remarks about their posts. Your comments were not aimed at helping the OP at all just showing up the others. There was no reason for it and my earlier comments are probably close to the truth. I have always held Fire Fox comments in regard, but his support of you in this case is surprising.

Well, sorry to offend. But:

• the Post Office and Royal Mail are 2 separate organisations and have been for a long time, so giving a pointer to the right one could really save the OP some time going to the wrong one.
• Any organisation using an address database would naturally use a single database from Royal Mail rather than attempt to amalgamate dozens of different council tax databases from across the land, so again, important to look at the right database.

so, I think I can make a fair case about helping the OP go in the right direction. If you think me childish for doing so, then so be it - but I am not going to let you intimidate me from posting, especially if appeasing you could mean that the OP wastes effort in the wrong directions.

And finally the ex wife bit? Are you going to justify that? It certainly isn't childish, it's more adult spite.

prudryden

DVardysShadow wrote: »

Well, sorry to offend. But:

• the Post Office and Royal Mail are 2 separate organisations and have been for a long time, so giving a pointer to the right one could really save the OP some time going to the wrong one.
• Any organisation using an address database would naturally use a single database from Royal Mail rather than attempt to amalgamate dozens of different council tax databases from across the land, so again, important to look at the right database.

so, I think I can make a fair case about helping the OP go in the right direction. If you think me childish for doing so, then so be it - but I am not going to let you intimidate me from posting, especially if appeasing you could mean that the OP wastes effort in the wrong directions.

And finally the ex wife bit? Are you going to justify that? It certainly isn't childish, it's more adult spite.

Actually, I got that wrong about the ex-wife. It isn't you but someone else. When I said the database, it was meant to be the RM as that was the one being referred to in the immediate previous posts. Shall we go back and delete our posts?

DVardysShadow

prudryden wrote: »

Actually, I got that wrong about the ex-wife. It isn't you but someone else. When I said the database, it was meant to be the RM as that was the one being referred to in the immediate previous posts. Shall we go back and delete our posts?

There is a word or 2 you could add, but I am getting quite used to the idea of having the reputation of having an ex wife. Having gone to the trouble of trawling your posts, I only regret suggesting that I picked you up as a stalker from the Marriage and Relationships forum - obviously I have annoyed you much closer to home.