We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Managing agent threaten to court
Comments
-
And there is no right of offset?Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0
-
I don't think so. I was advised by LEASE that there are only very limited reasons you can legally withhold service charges (Commonhold & Leasehold Reform Act 2002, section 21A). I have found two such 'loopholes' as our service charge demands were not in the prescribed form AND we were never sent the statement of our rights, mandatory since October 2007. I am currently £4K in arrears and this remains my trump card.
Instead of withholding you can challenge charges that you have already paid. If you read the LVT decisions they look for what specific services, what specific invoices and what specific years are disputed. This makes more sense when you consider that long leases normally allow for service charges to be collected in advance. You obviously can't dispute services that have not yet been rendered!
Court argument for the prosecution
The management company have to provide leaseholders with the summary of accounts "within one month or within six months of the end of the 12-month accounting period, whichever is the later". Therefore demands for 2009/2010 will rightly have gone out long before the 2008/2009 deadline for accounting and auditing. The OP can't reasonably expect the 'disputed' £500 to be offset until mid way through the following financial year by which time she was already six months in arrears without any legal foundation.
Having said all that I am not a solicitor and I might be wrong. Because none of us are legal eagles and because leasehold dispute specialists are rare and because proper legal advice is expensive, I would want to avoid the court route by paying up and disputing later. Perhaps Richard Webster will read the thread and confirm or deny my understanding.Declutterbug-in-progress.⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.7K Spending & Discounts
- 247.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.7K Life & Family
- 262.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards