We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Id fraud/catalogue/our rights...help!

janthemum
Posts: 487 Forumite

I hope I have posted in right place.
I will try not to ramble here goes...
OH recieved a statement from 'Very' catalogue today for £360. He has no account with them and never has. a selection of items had been ordered over december with special deliveries for a morning slot.
He knew sraight away it was ID fraud and they said the items were being shipped to a midlands address and we live near london. Apparantly they got suspicious and stopped anything else being shipped. Obviously they had given bogus date of birth etc. So no denying on any side it is ID fraud.
Now....on 23rd dec we recieved a package left on front door step, no advice note etc in it and inside was a bottle perfume (£42 worth we have now found out) as we enter comps we presumed it was a win as small wins often come with no acknowledgment slip; and even OH posted on WIN board on this site
So of course we opened it and tried it and were happy with our 'win'
But now this 'win' is itemised on this statement from very, the only item they had sent to our address (perhaps to make it look genuine to have something coming to registered address). So of course we told 'Very' on phone we had recieved this had no idea where it had come from thought it was a win but they are demanding we pay the £42 as we have opened it. I dont want the perfume i didnt choose it and didnt order it and happy to send it back. They said we must pay for it although recognise the id theft etc.
What are your views on this please. OH was going to pay by credit card there and then over phone but for the moment it has to be paid in the tome it says on the statement the fraudster set up!! why should we pay for what they ordered!
Your thoughts please. thanks
I will try not to ramble here goes...
OH recieved a statement from 'Very' catalogue today for £360. He has no account with them and never has. a selection of items had been ordered over december with special deliveries for a morning slot.
He knew sraight away it was ID fraud and they said the items were being shipped to a midlands address and we live near london. Apparantly they got suspicious and stopped anything else being shipped. Obviously they had given bogus date of birth etc. So no denying on any side it is ID fraud.
Now....on 23rd dec we recieved a package left on front door step, no advice note etc in it and inside was a bottle perfume (£42 worth we have now found out) as we enter comps we presumed it was a win as small wins often come with no acknowledgment slip; and even OH posted on WIN board on this site
So of course we opened it and tried it and were happy with our 'win'
But now this 'win' is itemised on this statement from very, the only item they had sent to our address (perhaps to make it look genuine to have something coming to registered address). So of course we told 'Very' on phone we had recieved this had no idea where it had come from thought it was a win but they are demanding we pay the £42 as we have opened it. I dont want the perfume i didnt choose it and didnt order it and happy to send it back. They said we must pay for it although recognise the id theft etc.
What are your views on this please. OH was going to pay by credit card there and then over phone but for the moment it has to be paid in the tome it says on the statement the fraudster set up!! why should we pay for what they ordered!
Your thoughts please. thanks
0
Comments
-
Just to clarify they say we have to pay as we actually opened the perfume bottle. of course if we had ordered it i understand of course we would have to pay. But surely we and 'Very' are covered in this way. I am not trying to do them in any way I dont want it and they can have it back....0
-
I think you'd be covered as the perfume were unsolicited goods so they shouldn't be requesting payment or the goods back.
http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/index/your_world/consumer_affairs/buying_goods_your_rights.htmCharging for goods you didn't order
Sometimes a trader tries to charge people for goods that they haven't actually ordered. This is against the law. It could happen when a trader sends you an advert for goods and includes a document that looks like an invoice, to give you the impression that you've already ordered the goods and now must pay up. It can also happen when you’re sent goods you didn't order and the trader demands immediate payment or the return of the goods. If this happens to you, you should report the trader to Consumer Direct – see under the heading Further help for contact details. You shouldn't pay the trader anything.
I'm no expert so feel free to correct me if I'm wrong0 -
this is a tough one, on one hand, I agree in theory with Lil_Me about the unsolicited goods. However I don't know what law takes precidence in a Id fraud case such as this. I think you will need to take specialist advice on this as it sounds complicated, given that the entire bill is in dispute.0
-
What i find funny is that Very can attempt to charge you for something, that you have not ordered. Nor entered into a contract with.
You did not sign a CCA to the account, nor agree to any terms over the telephone.
I would like to see how they proceed with this through a debt collection agency.
Sorry i cant help further.0 -
Thankyou for all your very helpful interesting replies. i will let you know further updates.0
-
Alias_Omega wrote: »What i find funny is that Very can attempt to charge you for something, that you have not ordered. Nor entered into a contract with.
You did not sign a CCA to the account, nor agree to any terms over the telephone.
I would like to see how they proceed with this through a debt collection agency.
Sorry i cant help further.
You need special advice, Something you won't get here go see a solicitor or if you have ID theft protection contact them0 -
Tell them to bill the address in the Midlands, as they obviously ordered it!
I would just return it opened as unsolicited goods, although I would insist they pay for the return delivery, as you did NOT order it.Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)0 -
I would start by asking them for your origional signed cca agreement as i am 110% sure they can not provide this to you,
And as they agree that it is identity theft and you did not order the goods i would do as another poster has mentioned offer them the purfume back on the grounds they pay for the return,
Say to them they have 7/14 days to collect the purfume or it will be disposed of as is unsolicited goods
Hopefuly you have not been using there stupidly expensive number but if you have use this one 0800 180000 (got it from say no to 0870.com and use it for my very account)
Hope you get it all sorted soon0 -
fishingcinema wrote: »I would start by asking them for your origional signed cca agreement as i am 110% sure they can not provide this to you,
And as they agree that it is identity theft and you did not order the goods i would do as another poster has mentioned offer them the purfume back on the grounds they pay for the return,0 -
fishingcinema wrote: »I would start by asking them for your origional signed cca agreement as i am 110% sure they can not provide this to you,
And as they agree that it is identity theft and you did not order the goods i would do as another poster has mentioned offer them the purfume back on the grounds they pay for the return,
Say to them they have 7/14 days to collect the purfume or it will be disposed of as is unsolicited goods
Hopefuly you have not been using there stupidly expensive number but if you have use this one 0800 180000 (got it from say no to 0870.com and use it for my very account)
Hope you get it all sorted soon
The OP did not request all the items and has shown it to be fraud which means they are not liable anywayWow, I got 3 *, when did that happen :j:T:p
It is not illegal to open another persons mail unless you intend to commit fraud - this is frequently incorrectly posted
I live in my head - I find it's safer there:p
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453K Spending & Discounts
- 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.4K Life & Family
- 255.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards