We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
use of my address by non-resident
Comments
-
I am well aware that interfering with the mail is a serious offence.
AFIK, after it is delivered it is no longer consideredin the course of its transmission by post"A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Gandhi
Ride hard or stay home :iloveyou:0 -
When was the last time anyone was prosecuted for opening a previous tenants mail and informing the debt collectors that they no longer lived there?0
-
I am well aware that interfering with the mail is a serious offence.
AFIK, after it is delivered it is no longer considered and thus OP could not be prosecuted for openning mail delivered to his address.
If you read my original post you will see that I neither agreed or disagreed with your original statement. I simply posted the legislation so that there would be no further need for debate or guesses on what was or wasn't legal about opening the lodger's mail.0 -
If you read my original post you will see that I neither agreed or disagreed with your original statement. I simply posted the legislation so that there would be no further need for debate or guesses on what was or wasn't legal about opening the lodger's mail.
OK :A
I read your post as this is the applicable legislation. I would suggest that after mail is delivered that legislation is no longer applicable.
FYI, I have no legal training and my opinion is merely ..... my opinion."A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Gandhi
Ride hard or stay home :iloveyou:0 -
Back to the original problem...
I would write/phone the debt collectors and inform them of the debtors contact details. If you get any more post for him just write "not known at this address" and stick it back in the post box.:jProud mummy to a beautiful baby girl born 22/12/11 :j0 -
I would also pass on the bloke's work address and as many details as I had about him.
He's already skipped out on you while you were away - time he faced up to his responsibilities.
Be very careful about allowing strangers from the internet into your home in future. Make sure that you check them out carefully. This should include checking with previous landlords, credit checks, employer references.0 -
The two relevant parts of the legislation are:
(1) A person commits an offence if, without reasonable excuse, he—
(a) intentionally delays or opens a postal packet in the course of its transmission by post, or
This does not apply once the post has been delivered.
(3) A person commits an offence if, intending to act to a person’s detriment and without reasonable excuse, he opens a postal packet which he knows or reasonably suspects has been incorrectly delivered to him.
This does not apply as the OP is not acting to the person's detriment.No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
(3) A person commits an offence if, intending to act to a person’s detriment and without reasonable excuse, he opens a postal packet which he knows or reasonably suspects has been incorrectly delivered to him.
This does not apply as the OP is not acting to the person's detriment.
And it has been delivered to the address on the envelope, so the delivery is not incorrect.What goes around - comes around0 -
I had bailiffs turn up looking for a previous occupant after I'd been sending back post marked "no longer at this address" for years.
I was advised by a solicitor to open future mail received at my address, write to the sender stating clearly that the person the letter was addressed to was no longer at the address on their records and make it clear that any further attempt to contact them at this incorrect address would be viewed as harrasment of the current occupant. Send the letters by registered post.
It worked where ordinary letters, phone calls and sent back post did not.
Don't ignore this, it can become a nightmare.My first reply was witty and intellectual but I lost it so you got this one instead
Proud to be a chic shopper
:cool:0 -
Here is the relevant section from the Postal Services Act 2000
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2000/ukpga_20000026_en_8#pt5-pb1-l1g84
Not really relevant at all. The package/post isn't in transit once its arrived the the address printed on it, and there's reasonable grounds to open up post addressed to your house if it looks like an overdue bill and you're worried debt collectors may call.If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.3K Spending & Discounts
- 243.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.6K Life & Family
- 256.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards