We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Pensions Planning: The NUMBER

1290291293295296

Comments

  • Grumpy_chap
    Grumpy_chap Posts: 21,338 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    So, the BBC is reporting what "the number" needs to be (after tax) for various standards of retirement:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3928m30v89o

    RetirementStandard

    Single

    Couple

    Minimum

    £13,900

    £22,500

    Moderate

    £32,700

    £45,400

    Comfortable

    £45,400

    £62,700

    It occurs to me that the "minimum" in the above will be met by SP alone in very many cases, yet the article suggests 82% would reach the minimum standard. That means 18% would fall short of that level.

    It also occurs to me that a good number of people never reach that "comfortable" level at any point in their life-times. Indeed, not everyone will reach the "moderate" level at any any point in their life-time.

  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,636 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper

    I guess all singletons only on the state pension or pension credit won't reach that level, also couples who rely on pension credit? (Although pension credit in reality is a gateway to a lot of other goodies that almost certainly lower the requirement)

    In general I find these numbers very unsatisfactory as I think they suggest people should be aiming for a higher standard of living in retirement than many have in employment, expecially if factoring the reduced expenses in retirment.

    I think....
  • Grumpy_chap
    Grumpy_chap Posts: 21,338 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker

    Indeed - for a couple of working age to have £62.5k after tax would require them to both be earning £39k or thereabouts. Joint salaries £78k. If the salary split between the couple is unequal then the total combined salaries will need to be rather higher still.

    For many retired people, housing expense is much lower then when working as the mortgage has been cleared down (not applicable for renters). To counter that reduction in required income, a retired couple with comfortable income and the extra time afforded by not working might well spend rather more on leisure activities and holidays than they did whilst working. Could very easily be more than the mortgage was costing them.

  • MarriedWithKids89
    MarriedWithKids89 Posts: 32 Forumite
    Fifth Anniversary 10 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 6 June at 10:48AM

    With reference to what I referred to as "Non-discretionary CAPEX" (irregular, but usually expensive unavoidable expenses like new windows, new boiler, replacing car, car/household repairs, etc.) we decided to average it out over our expected lifetime. However, some people prefer to just set aside a lump sum. Do whatever works best for you, just don't forget to take this type of potentially expensive expenditure into account.

    For what it's worth, £28K is pretty close to what we budgeted for subsistence (essentials) and "Non-discretionary CAPEX", so your total number (£40K including discretionary) looks reasonable but, of course, everyone's retirement looks and costs different.

  • GenX0212
    GenX0212 Posts: 294 Forumite
    100 Posts Second Anniversary Name Dropper

    Fair enough!

    Our target was to get as close to our existing joint disposable income as possible.That's the ideal isn't it being able to retire without any drop in income or living standards? So in our case about £60k net and it looks like we have managed to do just about that. The number will probably drop slightly lower later on in life as things slow down but if performance is maintained then who knows we might need a different outlook!

    Slightly ironically it is only because many years back my DB scheme was closed to further accruals that I even have a DC pot, if it hadn't been for that then there is every chance that I would have just carried on with the DB final salary alone. That would have given me a very good pension but certainly not anywhere near what we have now.

  • NoMore
    NoMore Posts: 1,958 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper

    wasn't specifically aimed at you (but at no point in your post do state what your number is) but rather there seems to have been a spate of people asking in this thread for help over the previous pages, (tbf you don't seem to be asking for help either), which isn't really the point of the thread

Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 355.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.8K Life & Family
  • 262.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.