We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Abbey/Santander Zero - no it aint!

2456

Comments

  • Degenerate wrote: »
    they are owned and controlled by the same parent entity, which ought to honour it's promises regardless of location.

    The common brand/ownership may indeed drive customers to have certain understandable expectations. But it's probably only a promise in the eye of the customer.

    Another example of marketing not aligned with reality, I fear.
  • Degenerate
    Degenerate Posts: 2,166 Forumite
    Another example of marketing not aligned with reality, I fear.

    That's a polite way of putting it. I would have said "Outright lies for which they should be punitively fined and made to pay their customers compensation."

    Ultimately, the Zero card is a Santander product. Santander promise they will charge nothing for cash withdrawals with this card and only warn that third parties may levy fees. I can see this being a case of the left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing, but that's no excuse.
  • Degenerate wrote: »
    That's a polite way of putting it. I would have said "Outright lies for which they should be punitively fined and made to pay their customers compensation."

    Ultimately, the Zero card is a Santander product. Santander promise they will charge nothing for cash withdrawals with this card and only warn that third parties may levy fees. I can see this being a case of the left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing, but that's no excuse.

    Santander in the UK is a different company to Santader in Argentina, different again to the one in Spain - there will be a company that sits on top of all of them, but they are very different. Some countries charge for ATM withdrwals. I've always had to pay in Greece IIRC. In Argentina it's quite possible that if you are a Santander Argentina customer you have to pay to use the ATM. Which falls under Santander's "3rd Parties may charge you". They ARE a 3rd party.
  • Degenerate
    Degenerate Posts: 2,166 Forumite
    Santander in the UK is a different company to Santader in Argentina, different again to the one in Spain - there will be a company that sits on top of all of them, but they are very different. Some countries charge for ATM withdrwals. I've always had to pay in Greece IIRC. In Argentina it's quite possible that if you are a Santander Argentina customer you have to pay to use the ATM. Which falls under Santander's "3rd Parties may charge you". They ARE a 3rd party.

    They are NOT a third party. Parent companies cannot wash their hands of their different subsidiary's actions in the way that you suggest.
  • That's why I never bothered with one of these cards. By ZERO they mean they won't charge you, but many banks in places I've travelled to in the past have levied a charge of their own - Something that your bank can only pass on to you.

    At the end of the day, once you get outside of Europe - particularly into Africa and Asia - the general rule is to charge anyone who isn't a customer of that bank... Something the banks in the UK did once upon a time.
  • Degenerate wrote: »
    They are NOT a third party. Parent companies cannot wash their hands of their different subsidiary's actions in the way that you suggest.

    Give me one reason why not?

    They are regulated by different laws, they have different banking licences. I have the same issues with Citibank. I still pay handling fees using US ATMs with my UK card. Square plugs and round holes!
  • Degenerate
    Degenerate Posts: 2,166 Forumite
    Give me one reason why not?

    They are regulated by different laws, they have different banking licences.

    But they have the same set of shareholders profiting from the product that they market in the UK as fee-free, and the ATM fee revenues in Argentina. These same shareholders are ultimately responsible for both the decision to market the Zero product as fee-free and the decision to charge ATM fees in Argentina. A subsidiary company, even a foreign one, is not a third-party by any normal interpretation. The misled customers have sound standing to complain.
    I have the same issues with Citibank. I still pay handling fees using US ATMs with my UK card.
    As Citibank have not been marketing a UK product that promises there will be no fees levied by Citibank for usage in ATMs across the world, this is completely irrelevant.
  • it would be interesting to know if Santander charge their customers for cash withdrawls in Argentina. It also happened in Chile as well.

    Interestingly the unpleasant woman I spoke to on the phone here wouldn't accept that there was a charge as it wasn't listed seperately. I had to point out that I was unlikely to have withdrawn 711.88 pesos out of a cash mine, she didn't seem to click that it wouldn't have given me coins.

    You live and learn and I still had a great time.
  • td_007
    td_007 Posts: 1,212 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Degenerate wrote: »
    My mistake, you didn't miss it - I completely disagree with your conclusion though. Santander banks in different countries may be different legal entities, but they are owned and controlled by the same parent entity, which ought to honour its promises regardless of location.

    You may disagree but that is the how it works. To be technically correct, foreign cash withdrawal commonly involve 3 charges: cash withdrawal fees, foreign transaction frees and ATM fees. Santander promises zero charges of the first two and not the 3rd i.e. ATM fees and the OP has incurred the 3rd fee mentioned. Therefore even assuming your pov, the OP has no case.
  • Degenerate
    Degenerate Posts: 2,166 Forumite
    td_007 wrote: »
    You may disagree but that is the how it works. To be technically correct, foreign cash withdrawal commonly involve 3 charges: cash withdrawal fees, foreign transaction frees and ATM fees. Santander promises zero charges of the first two and not the 3rd i.e. ATM fees and the OP has incurred the 3rd fee mentioned. Therefore even assuming your pov, the OP has no case.

    It would behove you to check what they actually claim for the product before spouting such rubbish:

    http://www.abbey.com/csgs/Satellite?canal=CABBEYCOM&cid=1210610544537&empr=Abbeycom&leng=en_GB&pagename=Abbeycom%2FPage%2FWC_ACOM_TemplateB2
    > 0% cash advance fee
    It’s reassuring to know that if you ever unexpectedly need cash from an ATM, you’ll pay zero fees for cash withdrawals1
    and:
    [FONT=Arial, Helvetica]1 Some independent ATM providers may charge a fee for cash withdrawals. Cash Transactions charged at a standard rate of 27.9% APR. Interest charged on all cash transactions from date of transaction.[/FONT]
    There's really no ambiguity in the wording. Only "some independent ATM providers" may charge, and there is no way a sister Santander subsidiary can be regarded as such.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.