We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Management company ripped us off!

Hi ya all,

We bought a 2-bed flat in April 08. We are among the first tenants moved in the development which have about 370 flats in total. The flats are selling very slowly and till now, I reckon only 30% of the flats are sold.

We paid service charge for £800 last April to cover period till this March. After 6 month chasing, finally got the service charge account audit which shows the actual cost for last year is only a fraction of what the management company budged and charged us for. Considering there are 370 flats, the proportionate amount we should have paid is only £150 (contribution to sinking fund incl) instead if £800!:mad: And base on the balance sheet, they only collected service charge from 30 flats! We recently find out people who buy later than us do not pay service charge as part of the incentive of buying whilst we are hit by another £800 for service charge starting this April.

According to our lease, we are entiled to a refund for the surplus from last year, which I have requested management company to action yet receive no reply. I also want to challenge them of rolling over the same unrealistic budget to this year whilst they clearly only spent 20% of the budget last year. Do you think I have an argument to get a reduction of this year's fee?

I am really fed up with management company now. I am willing to pay my fair portion of the service charge but not happy with being ripped off. Really appreciate your advice.

tks
«13

Comments

  • tbs624
    tbs624 Posts: 10,816 Forumite
    Get yourself over to http://www.lease-advice.org/ Much useful advice there :smiley:
  • pie81
    pie81 Posts: 530 Forumite
    Sounds like you have a good basis to argue both for a refund and a reduction in next year's estimated service charge (unless they can show there are some works coming up next year which need paying for). All depends on the terms of your lease however and how much it says they can charge.
  • furndire
    furndire Posts: 7,308 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    There was something about management fees, on working lunch bbc on Wed or Thurs this week. Maybe worth a look on i player
  • WLMJ
    WLMJ Posts: 59 Forumite
    thanks guys. I will check lease advice org website. I think I have a case for the refund if only the management company ever reply!lol

    The property management sector seems to be a grey and ill-regulated area. Does any one know which is the governing body?
  • WLMJ
    WLMJ Posts: 59 Forumite
    Just had a look on BBC working lunch, interesting program. tks
  • WLMJ wrote: »
    ...
    We paid service charge for £800 last April to cover period till this March. After 6 month chasing, finally got the service charge account audit which shows the actual cost for last year is only a fraction of what the management company budged and charged us for. Considering there are 370 flats, the proportionate amount we should have paid is only £150 (contribution to sinking fund incl) instead if £800!:mad: And base on the balance sheet, they only collected service charge from 30 flats! We recently find out people who buy later than us do not pay service charge as part of the incentive of buying whilst we are hit by another £800 for service charge starting this April.
    I know nothing about leasehold, but it looks to me like you should have no gripe about the management company letting the newcomers have the incentive - PROVIDED this is not being done at your expense.

    So I think you should always be paying 1/370th of the costs and the unoccupied flats and the incentivised occupied flats should be chargeable
    to the developer.
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • olly300
    olly300 Posts: 14,738 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I know nothing about leasehold, but it looks to me like you should have no gripe about the management company letting the newcomers have the incentive - PROVIDED this is not being done at your expense.

    So I think you should always be paying 1/370th of the costs and the unoccupied flats and the incentivised occupied flats should be chargeable
    to the developer.


    The OP won't be paying 1/370th, as the charges should be worked out on the size of the flats so someone in a studio flat will pay less than someone in a 3 bed flat.
    I'm not cynical I'm realistic :p

    (If a link I give opens pop ups I won't know I don't use windows)
  • olly300 wrote: »
    The OP won't be paying 1/370th, as the charges should be worked out on the size of the flats so someone in a studio flat will pay less than someone in a 3 bed flat.
    Fair point - but the principle should remain, OP should not be bankrolling incentives to new buyers.
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • blckbrd
    blckbrd Posts: 454 Forumite
    olly300 wrote: »
    The OP won't be paying 1/370th, as the charges should be worked out on the size of the flats so someone in a studio flat will pay less than someone in a 3 bed flat.

    That's right. A 1/370 share is too simplistic unless all of the properties are identical. OP ask for details of the apportionment of costs by bedroom-size across the block then recalculate your share.

    Actual annual service charge costs for any given year (1 Apr 2008/31 Mar 2009) are required by law to be provided within 6 months of the year end (30 Sept 2009). If the management company did this they are within the law.

    Estimated annual costs may have been (reasonably) based on full occupation of the property. Such may again be the basis for the current year's costs. It is common to base estimates on the actual figures from 2 years prior (which do not exist in your case) as this would be the most complete set of figures available at the time of estimating the budget. So for 2010/11 estimated annual lcharges should be based on the actual figures for 2008/2009 but as (if) more properties are sold I'd expect there to be an element of projection above inflation.

    You are entitled to a refund for any overpaid annual charges. Send them a letter before action if they are ignoring your general written requests. Then take them to small claims if they persist.

    Sinking fund payments may not be refundable as they are meant to create a pool of money to spend on large scale repairs which would cost a lessee over £250 and on which you would have to be consulted. Such money does not have to be spent within the financial year it's collected.

    I'd be interested to see the heads of charge and costings for the annual bill if you care to share it here.
    Opinion, advice and information are different things. Don't be surprised if you receive all 3 in response. :D
  • Fire_Fox
    Fire_Fox Posts: 26,026 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 21 November 2009 at 1:22PM
    WLMJ wrote: »
    We paid service charge for £800 last April to cover period till this March. After 6 month chasing, finally got the service charge account audit which shows the actual cost for last year is only a fraction of what the management company budged and charged us for.

    Considering there are 370 flats, the proportionate amount we should have paid is only £150 (contribution to sinking fund incl) instead if £800!:mad: And base on the balance sheet, they only collected service charge from 30 flats! We recently find out people who buy later than us do not pay service charge as part of the incentive of buying whilst we are hit by another £800 for service charge starting this April.

    According to our lease, we are entiled to a refund for the surplus from last year, which I have requested management company to action yet receive no reply. I also want to challenge them of rolling over the same unrealistic budget to this year whilst they clearly only spent 20% of the budget last year. Do you think I have an argument to get a reduction of this year's fee?

    I am really fed up with management company now. I am willing to pay my fair portion of the service charge but not happy with being ripped off. Really appreciate your advice.

    thanks guys. I will check lease advice org website. I think I have a case for the refund if only the management company ever reply!lol

    The property management sector seems to be a grey and ill-regulated area. Does any one know which is the governing body?

    If you had read the LEASE website (it is huge and a brilliant resource) you wouldn't need to ask about governing bodies. TBH you seem to be assuming you are being ripped off without any real understanding of how service charges work. Your money hasn't vanished into the ether; rather than asking for a refund I'd be insisting the budgeted work is carried out to spec. Do you know why so little of the budget has been spent?

    You pay two years service charges to the new owners one year as you have lived there and benefited from the communal areas for longer! As others have said, the developer/ freeholder should be contributing on behalf of the remaining flats.

    When you say you are chasing the management company for the service charge audit and for a refund are you doing so in writing by recorded delivery? Once you have read the LEASE website you will have an understanding of your rights to further information as laid out in the Landlord-Tenant Act 1985 - quote this at your managing agents if they are breaching the legislation. Also quote the clause in your long lease when formally requesting the refund.
    Declutterbug-in-progress.⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.7K Life & Family
  • 262.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.