We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
orange charging me for contract but not allowing me to use it
Hi
i would be grateful for comments or advice on the following.
at the end of last year i was going and still am through a sticky patch and was unable to pay my orange bill - as i did not pay the first one on time i then had two to pay - i was not allowed to use the service as i was in debt and not able to clear the debt - this is fair enough but now a year on - i am now in a position to clear this debt - i now owe though loads of money as they have charged me all the costs incurred for the contract time that i have not been able to use as they would not let me.
i do know i owe them money and am happy to pay for that - what i am not so happy about is that i have to pay about £500 the rest of the value of the contract yet i have not been able to use the service.
is it unfair to make me pay for something i was not allowed to use - surely i should either have been able to use it or if they felt they might be owed too much money - not charge me for what i have not been able to use.
would it be reasonable of me to say that i will pay my debt but not the contract charges that occured when orange would not let me use the service but that i am also happy to have the rest of the contract time back and fulfil my obligation to orange now that i can afford to pay them even though this does mean me having two phone numbers.
would like a view on my thoughts in case i am being unreasonable
thanks
i would be grateful for comments or advice on the following.
at the end of last year i was going and still am through a sticky patch and was unable to pay my orange bill - as i did not pay the first one on time i then had two to pay - i was not allowed to use the service as i was in debt and not able to clear the debt - this is fair enough but now a year on - i am now in a position to clear this debt - i now owe though loads of money as they have charged me all the costs incurred for the contract time that i have not been able to use as they would not let me.
i do know i owe them money and am happy to pay for that - what i am not so happy about is that i have to pay about £500 the rest of the value of the contract yet i have not been able to use the service.
is it unfair to make me pay for something i was not allowed to use - surely i should either have been able to use it or if they felt they might be owed too much money - not charge me for what i have not been able to use.
would it be reasonable of me to say that i will pay my debt but not the contract charges that occured when orange would not let me use the service but that i am also happy to have the rest of the contract time back and fulfil my obligation to orange now that i can afford to pay them even though this does mean me having two phone numbers.
would like a view on my thoughts in case i am being unreasonable
thanks
0
Comments
-
If you default on the contract then the whole fee (for the term) becomes due. It's in the T&C's.
They are right in changing you and (I'm afraid) you have to pay it. Sorry..0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards