out of the blue arrears demand

speedster

kelloggs36 wrote: »

Being investigated does not mean that they are actually guilty of any offence. I can't see how informing somebody that they accept credit cards etc is financial advice - it is merely letting them know what their options are. AT the end of the day the debt is still owed and is a priority debt.

really??

please read.


http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199798/cmselect/cmhaff/258-i/ha0118.htm

speedster

kelloggs.

you can stick up for them and quote the rules till you're blue in the face.

fact remains that they are breaking the laws of this country and are now starting to be held accountable for their actions.

they've lost crown immunity, the FSA are investigating, the 2 year steer "law" and recent european developements have come to light too.

their time of doing as they please is coming to an end.

DX2

speedster wrote: »

really??

please read.


http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199798/cmselect/cmhaff/258-i/ha0118.htm

That's an interesting link :rolleyes: has it actually got anything to do with the CSA

NOTE BY THE METROPOLITAN POLICE

(Example of officers subject to disciplinary proceedings retiring due to ill health)

speedster

DX2 wrote: »

That's an interesting link :rolleyes: has it actually got anything to do with the CSA

NOTE BY THE METROPOLITAN POLICE


(Example of officers subject to disciplinary proceedings retiring due to ill health)

i tend not to read your rubbish anymore, but yes the link is relevant.

if you'd bothered to read the posts you'd know who barry porter is, wouldn't you???

as you know everything anyway.

kelloggs36

speedster wrote: »

kelloggs.

you can stick up for them and quote the rules till you're blue in the face.

fact remains that they are breaking the laws of this country and are now starting to be held accountable for their actions.

they've lost crown immunity, the FSA are investigating, the 2 year steer "law" and recent european developements have come to light too.

their time of doing as they please is coming to an end.

But what you are saying is that they are guilty - when the investigation has not been concluded yet, so no, as it stands at the present time, they are not guilty! Had they been found guilty then they would not be deliberately breaking any laws and continuing with this practise. Wait until the outcome of the investigation before stating things as 'fact'.

speedster

no nvestigation took place, due to him quitting.

if he had nothing to hide. why quit??

kelloggs36

speedster wrote: »

i tend not to read your rubbish anymore, but yes the link is relevant.

if you'd bothered to read the posts you'd know who barry porter is, wouldn't you???

as you know everything anyway.

I am aware who Barry Porter is, but that link about his past does not mean anything in relation to this thread. Barry Porter is the head of the Criminal Compliance team of a specific office within the CSA - he does not make policy nor lay down the rules which are made by senior management (which he is not).

kelloggs36

And BTW I have a specific reason to be peeved with Mr Porter because he withdrew a job offer from me because I refused to attend a training course whilst on maternity leave!

DX2

speedster wrote: »

i tend not to read your rubbish anymore,
as you know everything anyway.

Likewise love

DX2

kelloggs36 wrote: »

I am aware who Barry Porter is, but that link about his past does not mean anything in relation to this thread. Barry Porter is the head of the Criminal Compliance team of a specific office within the CSA - he does not make policy nor lay down the rules which are made by senior management (which he is not).

Your wasting your time