We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Are energy prices fair

2

Comments

  • Fire_Fox
    Fire_Fox Posts: 26,026 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    mattcanary wrote: »
    Everyone should be able to heat their home sufficiently within a modern, so called civilised country. Many people that have problems in doing this are elderly, often frail people that are someone's parent or grandparent. Many die each winter because they cannot afford to keep their house warm. In a supposedly civilised country!

    How many pensioners die each winter from hypothermia? And of those how many die without any assets, i.e. they genuinely can't afford more heating?
    Declutterbug-in-progress.⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️
  • mattcanary
    mattcanary Posts: 4,420 Forumite
    Enlighten me - Fire Fox. What are the stats?
  • Ken68
    Ken68 Posts: 6,825 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Energy Saving Champion Home Insurance Hacker!
    Millions of non internet savvy OAP's are paying full wack, although the WFA does help.

    http://news.patient.co.uk/newspaper.asp?ss=10&pc=9135
  • Premier_2
    Premier_2 Posts: 15,141 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    mattcanary wrote: »
    Everyone should be able to heat their home sufficiently within a modern, so called civilised country. Many people that have problems in doing this are elderly, often frail people that are someone's parent or grandparent. Many die each winter because they cannot afford to keep their house warm. In a supposedly civilised country!

    If higher-earning people have to be taxed a little (a LITTLE) bit higher so this can be achieved, it should be done. Richer people can afford it.
    This government spends £2.7bn per year giving out winter fuel benefits granting people in need up to £400 per year extra to cope with with winter fuel bills.

    Perhaps if those in need actually spent that money on what it was intended for, rather than buying their grandchilden christmas presents with it, they wouldn't die.
    "Now to trolling as a concept. .... Personally, I've always found it a little sad that people choose to spend such a large proportion of their lives in this way but they do, and we have to deal with it." - MSE Forum Manager 6th July 2010
  • Haarlem
    Haarlem Posts: 345 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Premier wrote: »
    This government spends £2.7bn per year giving out winter fuel benefits granting people in need up to £400 per year extra to cope with with winter fuel bills.

    Plus the levy we all pay (averaging £76pa) to enable Social Tariffs to be offered to selected customers.
  • KimYeovil
    KimYeovil Posts: 6,156 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    mattcanary wrote: »
    Enlighten me - Fire Fox. What are the stats?

    About 0.0%.
  • Ken68
    Ken68 Posts: 6,825 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Energy Saving Champion Home Insurance Hacker!
    Once the money is in someones wallet or bank account, how do you know how they spend it. ? And if you give vouchers or whatever, the energy providers will just fiddle it away.
    I for one like the present system, up to me if I spend it on whisky, and that would be my problem anyway, nowt to do with you.
  • Cardew
    Cardew Posts: 29,064 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Rampant Recycler
    There are no reliable statistics on people 'dying of cold'.

    Those who make the emotive remarks, as above - about people dying each winter beacause they cannot afford to keep their houses warm - usually quote the 'excess winter death' figures.

    Unquestionably more people die during the winter. This link gives some facts:

    http://www.ageconcern.org.uk/AgeConcern/ftf_winter_deaths.asp

    However to deduce that people cannot afford to heat, and hence die, is a nonsense.
  • aelitaman
    aelitaman Posts: 522 Forumite
    Personally I think they have the pricing the wrong way round. Currently you pay a lot upfront to have gas then when this standaing charge or primary units have been consumed you get cheap gas. My last gas tariff was 2.05p per Kwh so after paying the primary the bill is never going to be expensive for "over using" gas. If I decided to use another 10000Kwh per gas by haveing a sauna or a hot tub then this would cost 205 piunds or 17 pounds a month averaged over a year. In terms of people earning 80K plus per year this is one meal in a fancy restaurent, no deterent against using gas at all.

    So in my view the tariffs should be the other way around. The govt or ofgem should decide what an average gas consumption per year would be for a couple 2 kids (replacements for the parents) in an average decently insulated house.

    The tariffs should start low so that single people that are frugal or old age pensioners that have to heat one or two rooms constantly in winter are not penalised by charges.

    Then the tariffs should increase to a reasonable figure at cthe average consumption decided above and for gas I think this should be about 400 to 500 pounds per year total charge for this average consumption.

    Then the tariffs should sky rocket so that people that have 6 kids or mansions or are really profligate with energy pay massive ammounts for this over consumption. A 16 room mansion in london with a rich couple in it that can afford 15K a year private school fees should be paying 10K a year for gas comsption of arround 30000 plus Kwh per year.

    The same should be done with electricity. This is the only way that people will stop being profligate with energy. Reward them for being repsonsible instead of penalising the frugal and not charging the profligate enough.

    Is it going to happen no chance why? Because once the energy companies have covered thier costs they want you to use more and more because it is basically all profit (just the cost of the gas used) hence we have high initial useage charges and then low cost per Kwh.
  • Cardew
    Cardew Posts: 29,064 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Rampant Recycler
    aelitaman wrote: »
    Personally I think they have the pricing the wrong way round. Currently you pay a lot upfront to have gas then when this standaing charge or primary units have been consumed you get cheap gas. My last gas tariff was 2.05p per Kwh so after paying the primary the bill is never going to be expensive for "over using" gas. If I decided to use another 10000Kwh per gas by haveing a sauna or a hot tub then this would cost 205 piunds or 17 pounds a month averaged over a year. In terms of people earning 80K plus per year this is one meal in a fancy restaurent, no deterent against using gas at all.

    So in my view the tariffs should be the other way around. The govt or ofgem should decide what an average gas consumption per year would be for a couple 2 kids (replacements for the parents) in an average decently insulated house.

    The tariffs should start low so that single people that are frugal or old age pensioners that have to heat one or two rooms constantly in winter are not penalised by charges.

    Then the tariffs should increase to a reasonable figure at cthe average consumption decided above and for gas I think this should be about 400 to 500 pounds per year total charge for this average consumption.

    Then the tariffs should sky rocket so that people that have 6 kids or mansions or are really profligate with energy pay massive ammounts for this over consumption. A 16 room mansion in london with a rich couple in it that can afford 15K a year private school fees should be paying 10K a year for gas comsption of arround 30000 plus Kwh per year.

    The same should be done with electricity. This is the only way that people will stop being profligate with energy. Reward them for being repsonsible instead of penalising the frugal and not charging the profligate enough.

    Is it going to happen no chance why? Because once the energy companies have covered thier costs they want you to use more and more because it is basically all profit (just the cost of the gas used) hence we have high initial useage charges and then low cost per Kwh.

    Actually in the much maligned energy profligate USA they have such a system in some States.

    In a property I own, I pay at a lower rate for the first 1,000kWh per month and then an extra 10% for any consumption over that.

    For every multi-millionaire living in a 15 room mansion in London, I suggest there are many widows/widowers living in old large houses that cost a lot to heat.

    Besides it wouldn't take too much ingenuity for large houses to have separate supplies to ' The West Wing', The East Wing' the Servants quarters etc;)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.