Going to court

hundredk

shell_542 wrote: »

PMSL. Do you really think I would actually write it on the board if I thought it after Lizzie's "I'm not naming names" comment?

You can believe what you like. I thought my comment was pretty straight forward. Every poster on here could have multiple accounts for all I care. I come on here to offer advice if I can and discuss a topic which interests me. I'm not interested in playing MSE AE Detective as others seem to be.

I don't think any more about it other than the comment I made in #81.;)

LizzieS_2

shell_542 wrote: »

Do you really think I would actually write it on the board if I thought it after Lizzie's "I'm not naming names" comment?

Except you wrote it before I stated that I would not name names

LizzieS wrote: »

Most of the posts in this part of the forum are done by 2 people with numerous AE's - easier to play along than start naming who is who, also leaves them wondering what you know

Above was politely suggesting DX2 chilled out instead of quoting AE's.

shell_542 wrote: »

Are Lizzie and Kelloggs the same person because they share similar opinions and regularly back up each others posts?

I read this and as you saw from my later posts, I had ignored it. I have read the same statement before so was not surprised to read it again, lol.

LizzieS wrote: »

I said MOST of the posts, ie not all. I never mentioned individual posters at all and have no intention of doing so.

The above is where I said that I wouldn't name names - reason being that it wasn't the purpose of my earlier post anyway.

DUTR wrote: »

I don't think Lizzie is Kellogs36, however I do feel there is a gang mentality on this forum which does spoil things

Well you got one response.

shell_542 wrote: »

I do hope you sensed the sarcasm in my comment about Lizzie and Kelloggs being one person ... I forgot to add the

Didn't really see why you had to respond.

LizzieS wrote: »

Can you not just admit that you made a wrong guess

As first post to DX2, it was a chill out and stop getting uptight over what people think. In other words, it was light-hearted.

shell_542

LizzieS wrote: »

Didn't really see why you had to respond.
.

Because DUTR had misread my comment (as had you it would appear) and I wanted to inform him that I didn't actually think you and Kelloggs were the same person. I was just trying (badly) to make a point.

I do not think you and Kelloggs are the same person.

shell_542

The naming names comment I made was referring to this post ...

LizzieS wrote: »

Most of the posts in this part of the forum are done by 2 people with numerous AE's - easier to play along than start naming who is who, also leaves them wondering what you know

not this one ...

LizzieS wrote: »

I said MOST of the posts, ie not all. I never mentioned individual posters at all and have no intention of doing so.

Hope that clears it up.

LizzieS_2

Personally Shell I would have left DUTR comment and only said something else if anyone else did.

Perhaps I did misread your original comment (although I did initially ignore it if you see what I mean), but that was due to not putting any weight to it being important or personal. I suppose I just didn't see the point in carrying on a discussion over something that wasn't really being discussed.

No offence meant or taken. Agreed?

Edit: accept your reading of the other point as I can see how you could reach that conclusion even though I didn't intend the post that way at all.

shell_542

I didn't leave it because if DUTR had misread my comment, others may have as well and I wanted to clear it up.

Agreed.

Blonde_Bint

can I just say that I am me, I am only ever me and if you are in doubt just remember that i dont possess the brain power necessary to keep on top of 1 identity never mind 2 :rotfl:

though I do accept this troll and multiple identities is going on well so be it. in between it all are the genuine, I prefer to treat all as genuine (have an inability to weed out the others mostly) because trying to decipher troll or genuine would require more brain power than i am willing to dedicate to the issue:D

LizzieS_2

Blonde_Bint wrote: »

though I do accept this troll and multiple identities is going on well so be it.

Form a personal point of view I am uninterested in what people do on here - I do however find the information useful for deciding to ignore the supposed recomendations for products on sale sites (yes it is the same people posting there with real names that are not actually their real names).

Sorry Binty if thats too cryptic.