We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Dangers of having lump of cash in bank?

Hi All,

Lets say I have 50k cash and chose to keep it in the bank (e.g. 2 year fixed bond) - is there a danger given the new economy? I am aware of the 50k limit, but I am thinking more along the lines of:

- Should there be hyperinflation, the 50k in relative terms will be more and more worthless and therefore I am better of investing in Gold

- Currency devaluation gets to a point that my 50k has less power in the future

- Interest rates remain low while inflation is relatively high (not good for a saver!)

I am looking at this from a more strategic viewpoint and would value any input...
Smile and be happy, things can usually get worse!
«13

Comments

  • ses6jwg
    ses6jwg Posts: 5,381 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    If you are worried about inflation what about index linked bonds from NS&I.

    I believe they pay the rate of inflation + 1.5% and are 3 or 5 years.
  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    edited 7 October 2009 at 4:25PM
    Should there be hyperinflation, the 50k in relative terms will be more and more worthless and therefore I am better of investing in Gold

    Of course there might not be hyper or even high Inflation, Gold goes to $500 oz and your 50 grand becomes 25 grand.

    It's not a one way bet.

    P.S. This is not meant to be argumentative. I personally think Gold will appreciate in price, even from here, but sometimes when reading posts about Gold I feel people fail to appreciate that the downside risks can be as great as the possible upside.
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • Scooby_Man
    Scooby_Man Posts: 131 Forumite
    purch wrote: »
    Of course there might not be hyper or even high Inflation, Gold goes to $500 oz and your 50 grand becomes 25 grand.

    It's not a one way bet.

    P.S. This is not meant to be argumentative. I personally think Gold will appreciate in price, even from here, but sometimes when reading posts about Gold I feel people fail to appreciate that the downside risks can be as great as the possible upside.

    Hmmm...Mr Brown sold UK gold - 40% of it I believe at 200 US and now its what 1000? The problem with printing so much money (QE) is that there is not anything to support it and my concern is that there is a real risk that the value of paper money will fall rapidly. So the hard effort to put together 50k may become meaningless...
    Smile and be happy, things can usually get worse!
  • ses6jwg wrote: »
    If you are worried about inflation what about index linked bonds from NS&I.

    I believe they pay the rate of inflation + 1.5% and are 3 or 5 years.

    I think the current issue is 1.0% + index-linking.
  • gozomark
    gozomark Posts: 2,069 Forumite
    Scooby_Man wrote: »
    my concern is that there is a real risk that the value of paper money will fall rapidly..

    there is a risk of that, but I believe very small - as soon as the economy starts improving, taxes will rise, govt spending will be cut, and the QE will be unwound. To me the risk is that this will happen too soon and not too late, so the real risk to me remains deflation.
  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    So the hard effort to put together 50k may become meaningless...

    Yes, as will always be the case if you choose and aggressive investment strategy and are wrong.

    Gold is not a perfect hedge against Inflation, despite what some try to preach.

    If we do have Hyper-Inflation then buying £50k of Gold now will probably not save you 100% from the effects, and if we don't and only experience normal levels of Inflation, even if you have only hedged 10% for your £50K into Gold you will struggle to break even.
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • Scooby_Man
    Scooby_Man Posts: 131 Forumite
    gozomark wrote: »
    there is a risk of that, but I believe very small - as soon as the economy starts improving, taxes will rise, govt spending will be cut, and the QE will be unwound. To me the risk is that this will happen too soon and not too late, so the real risk to me remains deflation.

    Interesting.
    If QE is unwound fast - say through tax increase, that would reduce consumer spending - so interest rates would be kept low (so no savings), putting pressure on banks (who wont be able to lend)...we end up in another vicious circle!

    perhaps its all down to where the tax rises hit...or which party comes in. I think tax rises are going to be worse under labour...
    Smile and be happy, things can usually get worse!
  • Scooby_Man
    Scooby_Man Posts: 131 Forumite
    purch wrote: »
    Yes, as will always be the case if you choose and aggressive investment strategy and are wrong.

    Gold is not a perfect hedge against Inflation, despite what some try to preach.

    If we do have Hyper-Inflation then buying £50k of Gold now will probably not save you 100% from the effects, and if we don't and only experience normal levels of Inflation, even if you have only hedged 10% for your £50K into Gold you will struggle to break even.

    Thinking aloud....if we do get hyper inflation, wont the interest rates rise to keep in touch? therefore the 50k would grow, right? And therefore maybe I should not put into a 2+ year fixed - maybe a 1 year fixed with clause to withdraw?

    Good discussion guys
    Smile and be happy, things can usually get worse!
  • gozomark
    gozomark Posts: 2,069 Forumite
    Scooby_Man wrote: »
    Interesting.
    If QE is unwound fast - say through tax increase, .

    unwinding QE requires the selling of the assets that have been bought, and then the cancellation of the money - nothing to do with tax
  • Scooby_Man
    Scooby_Man Posts: 131 Forumite
    gozomark wrote: »
    unwinding QE requires the selling of the assets that have been bought, and then the cancellation of the money - nothing to do with tax

    Wasn't QE just printing money rather than purchasing assets? And this money needs to be recouped through raising money (or was it technically the BoE bought Gov Gilds or something?)
    Smile and be happy, things can usually get worse!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 261.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.