We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Employment analysis

A breakdown of the employment data for Sept, it seems the young are bearing the brunt of job losses, the data however was better than expected.

The labour market figures published on 16 September were more positive than many expected, as well as showing continued falls in employment and rises in unemployment and inactivity.

Apologies if this has already been annalized to death

http://www.cesi.org.uk/statistics/

On the negative side there appears a spike in the people enquiring about the job centre.


http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=jobcentre%2Cbenefits&geo=GB&date=today%2012-m&cmpt=q
'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
«13

Comments

  • Interesting stats, I've not seen that before.

    In terms of house prices/pruchases, I'm thinking the majority of unemployed folk are those who wouldn't really be in a position to buy a house anyway, job or no job.
  • PasturesNew
    PasturesNew Posts: 70,698 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    The data is flawed ... a lot of older people will be self-employed and not actually working, but living off savings, doing what they can and getting by in the hope that something will change any day now.

    Older people are less likely to sign on, whereas 100% of young unemployed will do.

    Older people in couples, say, might just have decided that they will be supported by their partner as it was time they slowed down so now would be a good time ... and other combinations/variations that are available to older couples that aren't available to single people living with their parents.
  • The data is flawed ... a lot of older people will be self-employed and not actually working, but living off savings, doing what they can and getting by in the hope that something will change any day now.

    Older people are less likely to sign on, whereas 100% of young unemployed will do.

    Older people in couples, say, might just have decided that they will be supported by their partner as it was time they slowed down so now would be a good time ... and other combinations/variations that are available to older couples that aren't available to single people living with their parents.
    Conveniently this gets brushed under the carpet, the forgotten unemployed i y l :confused: Lots of s/e people in and out scratting for work but have savings so not entitled or t b h can't be bothered to go through the rigmarole of declaring it. Tax payments will be hammered for a few years now.
    I came in to this world with nothing and I've still got most of it left. :rolleyes:
  • The data is flawed ... a lot of older people will be self-employed and not actually working, but living off savings, doing what they can and getting by in the hope that something will change any day now.

    Older people are less likely to sign on, whereas 100% of young unemployed will do.

    Older people in couples, say, might just have decided that they will be supported by their partner as it was time they slowed down so now would be a good time ... and other combinations/variations that are available to older couples that aren't available to single people living with their parents.

    That sounds a lot like speculative personal opinion rather than fact. I'm not saying it can't be true but it overly generalises IMO.

    Feel free to point me to articles and other stats that back the opinion up.
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    phil_b wrote: »
    That sounds a lot like speculative personal opinion rather than fact. I'm not saying it can't be true but it overly generalises IMO.

    Feel free to point me to articles and other stats that back the opinion up.

    Also if we are looking at it from a housing perspective older people will tend to have much smaller mortgages (if any) thus not being a downward force on house prices if they lose their job.
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • The data is flawed ... a lot of older people will be self-employed and not actually working, but living off savings, doing what they can and getting by in the hope that something will change any day now.

    Older people are less likely to sign on, whereas 100% of young unemployed will do.

    Older people in couples, say, might just have decided that they will be supported by their partner as it was time they slowed down so now would be a good time ... and other combinations/variations that are available to older couples that aren't available to single people living with their parents.

    Hmmm,

    Would this be the same group of 'older people' who don't claim incapacity benefit ?

    There are roughly 2.7m people on IB, 1.2m are over 50.

    You could equally say that older people may have access to a whole range of other benefits that an unemployed singleton living with parents doesn't.
    US housing: it's not a bubble

    Moneyweek, December 2005
  • On the negative side there appears a spike in the people enquiring about the job centre.


    http://www.google.com/insights/searc...%2012-m&cmpt=q


    Google graphs are not accurate.

    Do the same thing again from 2004 on the search. You will see what I mean.
    Not Again
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Google graphs are not accurate.

    Do the same thing again from 2004 on the search. You will see what I mean.

    It shows the same pattern :confused:

    http://www.google.com/insights/search/#q=jobcentre%2Cbenefits&geo=GB&cmpt=q
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • phil_b wrote: »
    That sounds a lot like speculative personal opinion rather than fact. I'm not saying it can't be true but it overly generalises IMO.

    Feel free to point me to articles and other stats that back the opinion up.

    The point is, there is no stats as they are not included.

    You have to look around and open eyes to other peoples situations, and PN is bang on.
  • kennyboy66 wrote: »
    Hmmm,

    Would this be the same group of 'older people' who don't claim incapacity benefit ?

    There are roughly 2.7m people on IB, 1.2m are over 50.

    You could equally say that older people may have access to a whole range of other benefits that an unemployed singleton living with parents doesn't.

    Quite right.
    Incapacity benefit was effectively an early form of retirement pension for many. Average person is on it for 7 years (& then they get to 60 & claim pension credits). It was also a great tool for thatcher in the 80's in her arguements that unemployment was under control/not rocketing.

    In addition, I work with young people in 2 seperate jobs. They don't consistently claim benefit, due to apathy (ie can't be @rsed, don't wanna get outta bed!), optimism (I'll get another job tomorrow/won't be outta work long), because they don't know the system, because they don't want to fill in the forms, or because someone (somewhere) will bail them out.
    It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.