PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Giving other half the power to sell our house?

2»

Comments

  • Quote:Originally Posted by Fire Fox
    Not necessarily, they may be able to purchase at tenants in common and so the ownership is split. The bank would have to agree to this - they'd obviously want access to at least some of the deposit, not effectively lend 100% on the wife's share.

    What bank will realistically agree to that though?

    A scenario the bank won't entertain is:

    Wife has mortgage in her name, house registered in both names. Wife defaults on mortgage so bank tries to repossess, bank can't then repossess because husband has a legal interest, bank loses lots of money.

    I have never heard of a mortgage lender that will agree to this tbh, the OP should really get legal advice in order to protect his interests.

    You can draw a distinction between who borrows the money and who gives the security for it - although most lenders don't go down that road and say that the borrowers and the security givers must be the same, i.e loan to one person that person is sole owner - loan to two people - both must own property.

    HSBC and a few others will lend to one person but if the house is to be held jointly they still require the other person to sign the mortgage deed to give security - so that would not work in OP's case unless they would accept an attorney's signature.

    Being tenants in common makes no difference at all. A lender can't realise a security on a share in a property!!!

    Also OP will need to have someone other than the other joint owner appointed as attorney because the Land Registry require at lease two signatures on the sale or other disposition of a proeprty owned by more than one person and the same person cannot sign in both "hats"
    RICHARD WEBSTER

    As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.
  • Thanks, my solicitor has just said " [FONT=&quot]Yes the Land Registry will require two signatures. The power of attorney would be limited to the sale of the property so anyone can be a signatory. [/FONT][FONT=&quot][/FONT] "

    I'm hoping that is correct.
  • Also does anyone know how much a general power of attorney should cost, I've seens forms for about £15 which say you can do it yourself as it does not have to be registered.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.