We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
What can I do about a ludicrous valuation of our property
Comments
-
I don't get what the problem is. The estate agent doesn't give a real fair value, they give an overinflated value to make you feel good so you sell your house through them. A proper survey valuation take into account the real value of the property.
And just for your information, prosecution only happen in crimial law, not civil. You mean can you sue the lender, and the answer to that in no.0 -
OK just an update.
Been to see my solicitor, I can confirm that I can sue the bank, but if I were to win, I would need proof of my alegation, something I am working to produce.
At present I intend to go ahead, but I'll need compelling proof first.
As for the rather unhelpful comments about estate agents over inflating prices, I don't think that the comments are even relevant to the problem. Everyone knows estate agents over inflate prices (at least they do in England and Wales - slightly different in Scotland - and personally I far prefer that system).
The issue was never whether the estate agent was giving a genuine valuation, the issue was that the valuer didn't. You can't buy a 1 bedroom flat for the price he valued a 3 bedroom house - therefore his valuation is wrong. It is not genuine and according to my solicitors I can sue (not prosecute as correctly pointed out above).
Thank you to everyone who has posted helpfully.There is no intelligent life out there ... ask any goldfish!0 -
Before you waste (IMHO) more money and energy on the legal route, have you spoken to the lender and presented your 'evidence' directly?0
-
Your solicitor is barking mad - I've never heard of anyone sueing for a lenders valuation. For one thing the valuation is for the benefit of the lender, not you, secondly its a professional opinion, so unless you can show malicious intent you have no chance.
If his valuation is wrong then all lenders I know have an appeals process. But it involves producing (typically) three comparative sold prices from the last few months. It seems (as is usually the case) that there are no recent comparables.I am a Mortgage Adviser
You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.0 -
Is your solicitor asking for their fees up front, or are they prepared to persue the case on a no win no fee basis?0
-
Yes be careful with solicitors. I've known many egg on clients to do this or that which generates lots of fees for the solicitor. Further down the line with fees rising and the initial enthusiasm lost, the client usually has to pull out. Don't waste your money on the legal route; the valuation was for the lender, not you. If you don't like that lender, try another but I'd say that regrettfully your valuation fee is lost now.0
-
Is this solicitor going down the "no win no fee" route? If he isn't, then I'm thinking he's seeing £££££ rather than your dilema!
Why not just put your case in writing to the mortgage company? Or change mortgage company?Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)0 -
I may be wrong, but get the impression that the OP has taken the valuation as a personal insult.0
-
I think you are right ILW. I have been irritated by lender;s valuations in the past but it usually came right in the end.
The OP has been offered 101k instead if 110k, - it could cost a lot more than 9k to sort all this out......0 -
The way I see it you've not lost any actual money though. The house is still your home, you just may have to pay more for your mortgage.Jan 1st 07 Car loan £4830.46@12% Personal Loan £11,517@8% variable Overdraft £1500 July 2009Halifax-£0Debt free date 14th July 2009 :j0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards