Free Cinema Tickets - Discussion thread

no1monkey

gibneyl01 wrote: »

Poochface you are not a mod! I posted that 2 days ago and everybody else has just ignored it... apart from you who has to get involved in everythink! By the way i did check the codes thread and and when liverpool never came up i assumed that becos it was full it had been taken off!
People make mistakes no big deal but you cannot help but go on an on an on an on your boring us all. Just ignore me if you don't lyk me!

i would like to agree with gibney here... it totaly goes to prove my previous point about self appointed mods.... gibney simply asked if anyone had tickets... if no one does,, one would not expect a reply... but to get a reply stating youve asked for tickets that dont exist and wasted my time, or time that steve thinks youve wasted, is a joke.... if no one has tickets then just dont reply.. gibney has done nothing wrong here.... if the previous posts wernt read, then so what?? if someone asks for something they will just read the posts that follow their question.......

no1monkey

Poochface wrote: »

gibney, this is the 2nd time this week that you have asked for prevew tickets for a film that isn't previewing in Liverpool:(

Before posting why don't you take a look at the codes thread? After all it is less than two pages long and if you don't want to manually check one and a half pages, use the search facility.

The only preview is showing at FACT for members of the Slackers Club (please don't ask what that is, try doing your own research if you don't know). So unless you are an NUS member you won't be able to get a ticket.

i would like to agree with gibney here... it totaly goes to prove my previous point about self appointed mods.... gibney simply asked if anyone had tickets... if no one does,, one would not expect a reply... but to get a reply stating youve asked for tickets that dont exist and wasted my time, or time that steve thinks youve wasted, is a joke.... if no one has tickets then just dont reply.. gibney has done nothing wrong here.... if the previous posts wernt read, then so what?? if someone asks for something they will just read the posts that follow their question....... you didnt need to reply if you couldnt help... why ridicule someone publicy?????... just keep quiet or you may obtain the 'troll' status thats flying around...;)

no1monkey

steve9872 wrote: »

This is a very interesting statement. To achieve what you just claimed someone would have to regularly go through the codes thread, check the current availability of every screening and edit the posts as appropriate. This has never happened! nor is it ever likely to happen, too much unnecessary effort is involved. Posts are only removed when there's too much chat or the screening has been shown. Posts are usually only edited by the original poster just to add information and not very often. The usual method is to quote the original and add the extra information there.

You need to apologise to Pooch, she does a marvelous job finding tickets for people who ask for them. She isn't appreciated enough and when she complained about you asking for tickets that don't even exist, its because you were wasting her time.

get a grip... if no one can help with the request then just dont reply...... the question asked for nothing more than this... the term 'too many self appointed chiefs and not enough indians spring to mind'..... im glad i got a career.....

no1monkey

i wouldnt describe 'micmacs' as a 'delightfully quirky film' as poochface did... because that would sound exatly like something id read recently for myself online.... actually, after watching this, i found it to be a something and nothing french film.... good for a sunday afternoon sitdown after dinner but nothing to get too excited about

Poochface

no1monkey all you've done since you started posting is to stir. Take your own advice and keep your nose out of things that don't concern you.

Stop attacking long-term members who have contributed a lot to this hobby when you have done absolutely zilch.

Also the snide little dig about having a career is totally uncalled for as you know nothing about the people you are attacking and it is disgusting to imply that they have nothing else in their lives than to post on here.

That actually applies to the person you have decided to stick up for.

Asking for tickets to previews that don't exist has repercusions which have already been mentioned but which you have decided to overlook and ignore.

At least gibney tries to contribute by trying to find and post codes. You on the other hand have obviously migrated from another site for malicious reasons and nothing else. Mole-hunting are you?

Poochface

no1monkey wrote: »

i wouldnt describe 'micmacs' as a 'delightfully quirky film' as poochface did... because that would sound exatly like something id read recently for myself online.... actually, after watching this, i found it to be a something and nothing french film.... good for a sunday afternoon sitdown after dinner but nothing to get too excited about

I take it this has been posted for the sole purpose of being argumentative but as it is so badly written it is hard to tell. :rotfl::rotfl:
BTW if you are going to edit a message such as post 1997, try using the correct spelling - grammatical.

no1monkey

pooch....... CHILL...!!! you read between the lines and imply and assume all the time and make more problems than not..!!! and BTW its a personal choice if people use spell checker, not a requirement.. and im sure they can decide for themselves and do not need reminding its there.. but thanks for the 'great' suggestion....8) .. JUST DONT TALK TO THOSE YOU DONT LIKE ...!!...including me...im quite happy to ignore your posts from now on.... so, PLEASE DONT REPLY TO MY POSTS AT ALL..........thank you

roll on tomorrow eve, when im off to watch city island .....

atro1

To get back to the thread.
Damned annoyed SEEFILMFIRST sent me an email changing the start time of Karate Kid in Ashford on Sunday, which I duly posted in case anyone had not received an email.---and then they started the film at the original time. No more people came in after 10-30, if the tickets had not have been free I would probably have complained. [For the more serious among us, that was a joke, small attempt at humour!]

Mischa8

sho_me_da_money wrote: »

Yes I noticed the word "Reward" - That is exactly what I am to you and this thread.

"Pay for SKY" - Why have cotton when you can have silk? I'm happy with my N3 protected Cable service.

BRAP.......again.

You have such a bigheaded/inflation opinion of yourself sweetie - did you not notice where someone in a previous thread referred to you as a junior IT techie, which is PRECISELY what you are. and stuck up North too. LMAO

It's just too easy to wind you up though and respond. You seem to see yourself as a Robin Hood feature - probably Russell Crowe is your ultimate male role model. LMAO :rotfl:

Poochface

no1monkey wrote: »

...im quite happy to ignore your posts from now on.... .....

GOOD! I hope this applies to when I post the occasional code too!