We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
What's the Bank's Game?
 
            
                
                    TG82                
                
                    Posts: 79 Forumite                
            
                        
            
                    I sent a template letter off to HSBC to try to claim charges from the Jan 2000 - July 2001 period. It says on this website that it might be possible to claim from Jan 2000 onwards as it was not until 2006 that people began reclaiming, so it's in the six year period.
The letter gives them 40 days, but they sent something back to me in less than a week, but it contained NO letter, just statements from May 2001 -August 2001. It was almost as if they'd bunged them in an envelope and sent no accompanying letter to explain why they were incomplete, so that it would delay me from reclaiming. It almost seemed personal.
It makes me wonder whether the bank is up to something. Are they trying to buy time hoping that by October the fairness decision will be in their favour, and thus by delaying people like me who might be able to claim hardship before October, they might by the time the decision is made be able to turn me down?
                The letter gives them 40 days, but they sent something back to me in less than a week, but it contained NO letter, just statements from May 2001 -August 2001. It was almost as if they'd bunged them in an envelope and sent no accompanying letter to explain why they were incomplete, so that it would delay me from reclaiming. It almost seemed personal.
It makes me wonder whether the bank is up to something. Are they trying to buy time hoping that by October the fairness decision will be in their favour, and thus by delaying people like me who might be able to claim hardship before October, they might by the time the decision is made be able to turn me down?
0        
            Comments
- 
            I sent a template letter off to HSBC to try to claim charges from the Jan 2000 - July 2001 period. It says on this website that it might be possible to claim from Jan 2000 onwards as it was not until 2006 that people began reclaiming, so it's in the six year period.
 The letter gives them 40 days, but they sent something back to me in less than a week, but it contained NO letter, just statements from May 2001 -August 2001. It was almost as if they'd bunged them in an envelope and sent no accompanying letter to explain why they were incomplete, so that it would delay me from reclaiming. It almost seemed personal.
 It makes me wonder whether the bank is up to something. Are they trying to buy time hoping that by October the fairness decision will be in their favour, and thus by delaying people like me who might be able to claim hardship before October, they might by the time the decision is made be able to turn me down?
 Just to make you aware, the FSA Waiver on bank charges states they will only look at charges July 2001 to present.
 The issue of claiming further back than this point is about UTCCR 1999 and the issue of payback and how long is for the direction of the National Courts to decide.0
- 
            natweststaffmember wrote: »Just to make you aware, the FSA Waiver on bank charges states they will only look at charges July 2001 to present.
 The issue of claiming further back than this point is about UTCCR 1999 and the issue of payback and how long is for the direction of the National Courts to decide.
 So, if I send off to reclaim July 2001 onwards and am fortunate enough to receive a payout, will that be prejudicial if I then find later that I can reclaim money from Jan 2000 up to July 2001?0
- 
            
 It would be up to further litigation how far you will be able to reclaim but it should not prejudice you ability to claim further back should that time period be longer than the Limitations Act.So, if I send off to reclaim July 2001 onwards and am fortunate enough to receive a payout, will that be prejudicial if I then find later that I can reclaim money from Jan 2000 up to July 2001?0
This discussion has been closed.
            Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
 
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards