hes stopped paying....again...criminal compliance?

mitchaa

Matt_Fry wrote: »

The CSA calls that diversion of income.

Not at all, there are legitimate ways of keeping or reinvesting your profits in the company and only drawing a minimum wage based salary.

kelloggs36

jamespir wrote: »

true true they are his responsibility but were you in a long standing relantionship when you split ir was i a one night stand who you decided after a few years to youd get the money from i know men can be pains in the !!! im one and i do understand how hard it is to bring kids up on your own

but this whole process of sticking some willy nilly dad on the birth certificate and then expecting to claim money from no wonder theyre relucant to pay

you say going without is not an option what about women who refuse to claim from the csa are they all stupid
you get child benifit for each one of your kids child tax credits .. your wage or benifits ... and working tax credit to me thats more than enough money what do you want any more for

grees thats what it is ill have it cause i can

if the shoe was on the other foot would you be so willing to pay for kids you didnt see just because some crock of a company says you have to and the amounts that are decided arent fair either i dont think so

Personally I was married to him, but even if it was a one night stand, it does not negate the NRP responsibility - you do the deed you pay the price. If you don't want children, don't do the deed.

You can't put anybody's name on a birth certificate - if you are married you can put your husband but if you aren't married, you can't do it without the other parent agreeing.