We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Chipped My Tooth on Asda Peanut
Comments
-
I know you don't really expect stones in your peanuts, but I suppose it's a bit of a risk when you're eating certain foods - there's no way they can be sure that everything has been removed (like bones in fish fingers, or slugs on lettuce). I once bit into a piece of shell in some chocolate brazils - thought my brain was going to vibrate out of my skull (no teeth chipped, though).0
-
Albeit clearly not sufficient lengths....
So, in excess to:
-Sieving to remove large foreign bodies
-Gravity Separation
-Stone seperator
-Permanent magnet
-Visual inspection
-Metal detection
How would you propose to move a peanut size stone from a selection of peanuts, assuming from the above list that this stone is equal in size, shape, density, and of a similar colour?Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)0 -
What?
Of course they are.........................:rolleyes:
Not quite!0 -
So, in excess to:
-Sieving to remove large foreign bodies
-Gravity Separation
-Stone seperator
-Permanent magnet
-Visual inspection
-Metal detection
How would you propose to move a peanut size stone from a selection of peanuts, assuming from the above list that this stone is equal in size, shape, density, and of a similar colour?
Absolutely no idea. But I'm not in the peanut business....0 -
Pay the peanut inspectors £50 for each stone they find.
They would come to work with peanut shaped stones in their pocket and throw them in, so although they'd get paid for finding them, they would end up with even more in the system!!Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards