We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
oak tree in back garden
Comments
-
Oak trees are all protected,
Not true! I have a 200 year old tree with no TPO.
If the tree was well established before the houses were built there should be no problem.I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.0 -
alanobrien wrote:If they love the house simply get rid of the tree.
Nooooooooo!!!!
Oak trees are wonderful(says the treehugger) My M& D have 2 gorgeous Oaks, I used to virtually live in one of them when I was going through my turbulant teens.Noli nothis permittere te terere
Bad Mothers Club Member No.665
[STRIKE]Student MoneySaving Club member 026![/STRIKE] Teacher now and still Moneysaving:D
0 -
I'd keep it. It must be part of the character of the area. I'll try and get a professional opinion off a friend regarding the potential damage, root spread etc.A house isn't a home without a cat.
Those are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others.
I have writer's block - I can't begin to tell you about it.
You told me again you preferred handsome men but for me you would make an exception.
It's a recession when your neighbour loses his job; it's a depression when you lose yours.0 -
Hi
There is absolutely no comparison between an oak tree and a Leylandii.
The oak is a native species and gives shelter to more than 400 species of wildlife - birds, insects etc.
The Leylandii is a hybrid and it is a pest. It is NOT native, it grows at an astonishing rate, it dries out the soil and causes shade in neighbouring gardens. The oak, being deciduous, does shed its leaves, so that plants can grow under it before the leaf canopy becomes too thick. Leylandii is evergreen and it always looks the same. The oak looks different at different seasons of the year.
If I was lucky enough to have an oak tree in the garden I would cherish it. A few years ago my daughter and I were raising some from acorns, also sweet chestnuts and other native species. She presented some of them to the National Forest.
After she died, we planted an oak tree in the grounds of the agricultural college she'd attended - it's a long way from anywhere, but we did it because the oak was her favourite tree.
We suffer from Leylandii in next door's garden. Why they were planted there is a mystery, because there's also a high fence, so they weren't needed for 'privacy'. I have warned our neighbour that hedges now have a maximum height, and as these Leylandii are so close together that they form a hedge behind the fence, they need chopping. They do throw shadow and prevent the afternoon sun reaching part of our garden - no wonder my sun-loving plants, like lavenders, refuse to thrive in that part of the garden.
Margaret Clare[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]Æ[/FONT]r ic wisdom funde, [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]æ[/FONT]r wear[FONT=Times New Roman, serif]ð[/FONT] ic eald.
Before I found wisdom, I became old.0 -
Well. kenshaz, it's certainly worth considering!"Some say the cup is half empty, while others say it is half full. However, this is skirting around the issue. The real problem is that the cup is too big."0
-
mummytofour wrote:Our house was under pinned twice same as the houses either side, oh and just about all the houses in the street, there was basically an oak tree in every other garden!
Oak trees are not in themselves a menace to property - I suspect the real reason for the problem in your particular road was the nature of the soil (probably shrinkable clay) upon which foundations of this street were built. This tends to be the case with Victorian houses built on shallow foundations in high risk areas.
If there was a problem with local soil type /conditions, the presence of a mature oak tree (as with any large established tree) would already have caused movement in an older property which would come out in any survey or more likely be obvious to the casual observer.
The trees to be very careful about are poplars and willows - if these are anywhere in the vicinity of a building, there is a strong chance of direct damage.0 -
I have three oaks in the garden and they are fantastic, but I guess they are also over 100 ft from the front door as well
Leaves, acorns and dead branches don't bother me, but then again mine is not a showpiece lawn0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.3K Spending & Discounts
- 243.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 597.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.6K Life & Family
- 256.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards