We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Charged 17.5% VAT instead of 15%

Options
I went and got my photos taken for a passport renewal and used a local Photo-Me booth.

After paying the standard £4 and getting the photo taken and then developed I noticed that on the printout it stated that the £4 was made up of 17.5% VAT i.e. 60p.

I'm just wondering if this is allowed and is it illegal? I know the sums are small but I thought it should be brought up.
:hello:v :money:
«1

Comments

  • durham_girl
    durham_girl Posts: 2,715 Forumite
    It should have been changed to 15% AFAIK, I have no clue who you would contact about it though
    :j30/7/10:j

    :j24/1/14 :j
  • superscaper
    superscaper Posts: 13,369 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 25 July 2009 at 7:20PM
    hnisc wrote: »
    I went and got my photos taken for a passport renewal and used a local Photo-Me booth.

    After paying the standard £4 and getting the photo taken and then developed I noticed that on the printout it stated that the £4 was made up of 17.5% VAT i.e. 60p.

    I'm just wondering if this is allowed and is it illegal? I know the sums are small but I thought it should be brought up.

    Is it broken down? There are many places that charge 15% VAT but still have "17.5%" listed on receipts simply because their systems can't easily cope with being changed or they haven't bothered.

    If you have been overcharged it may still be worth enquiring even if it's only 9p. They should not be charging VAT at 17.5.
    "She is quite the oddball. Did you notice how she didn't even get excited when she saw this original ZX-81?"
    Moss
  • chedder789
    chedder789 Posts: 90 Forumite
    edited 25 July 2009 at 7:00PM
    You could possibly contact the company owning the booth, its probably on the side of the booth, the actual store probably would not be able to help, as they don't own it. Let us know how you get on!
  • System
    System Posts: 178,346 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    companys dont have to pass on the VAT reduction .
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • superscaper
    superscaper Posts: 13,369 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    CHRISSYG wrote: »
    companys dont have to pass on the VAT reduction .

    They can charge what they want for their products and services but it CANNOT be composed of a VAT larger than what VAT actually is. Tantamount to tax fraud. They could increase their base cost to compensate for the 2.1% reduction thereby not passing on any reduction to the customer but they can't still actually charge 17.5% VAT.
    "She is quite the oddball. Did you notice how she didn't even get excited when she saw this original ZX-81?"
    Moss
  • seagull09
    seagull09 Posts: 108 Forumite
    I found this on a news article and similar on a solicitor's website (http://www.bondpearce.com/Publications/427):

    "In November, Alistair Darling, the Chancellor, cut the standard rate of VAT from 17.5 per cent to 15 per cent until the end of this year to help boost spending. Ministers have urged shops to pass it on to consumers, but it is not compulsory to do so."

    Which ties in with what I've read elsewhere, it's not mandatory but advised. Unless something's changed more recently?
  • superscaper
    superscaper Posts: 13,369 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    seagull09 wrote: »
    I found this on a news article and similar on a solicitor's website (http://www.bondpearce.com/Publications/427):

    "In November, Alistair Darling, the Chancellor, cut the standard rate of VAT from 17.5 per cent to 15 per cent until the end of this year to help boost spending. Ministers have urged shops to pass it on to consumers, but it is not compulsory to do so."

    Which ties in with what I've read elsewhere, it's not mandatory but advised. Unless something's changed more recently?

    Is that passing on the saving though, as far as I can tell they still can't actually quote for "17.5% VAT". But they can still charge the same net price, just alter the base price to compensate instead of reducing the net price by 2.1%. Even in that article there's nothing there that gives shops permission to charge 17.5% VAT to consumers.
    "She is quite the oddball. Did you notice how she didn't even get excited when she saw this original ZX-81?"
    Moss
  • bap98189
    bap98189 Posts: 3,801 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    It's most likely just some old software in the machine. Sounds like they haven't bothered to update all their machines after the VAT reduction. I'm sure they will be accounting for it at 15% VAT, the problem will just be in the receipt printing software.

    By all means write to the company, but bear in mind that they will not reduce the overall price if they fix the issue. £4 is a nice round number, they don't want their machines having to dish out change all the time because they are charging £3.92.
  • KimYeovil
    KimYeovil Posts: 6,156 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    It has been £4 for years. It is not worth the time and trouble of sending out engineers twice over a period of twelve months to reprogramme the receipts from £3.xx + 17.5% VAT = £4.00 to £3.xx + 15% VAT = £4.00 and back again.

    Why put the price UP to £4.50 for everyone just because some miser moans about an incorrectly printed receipt means he can't claim the cost back on expenses? The company will be paying 15% VAT this year on a higher base cost.
  • Meepster
    Meepster Posts: 5,955 Forumite
    And TBQH is it really worth investigating further for 8p? It will cost you more in phone charges, or for a stamp, than you would actually get back...
    If it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family anatidae on our hands

This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.