We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
My solar PV first year payback calculation
Options
Comments
-
Photo_Stylus wrote: »Cat amongst the pigeons, How much interest would you earn on the initial £5450?Photo_Stylus wrote: »Did the installers say it could take 30 years to payback or did they say less than 10?Photo_Stylus wrote: »Did watchdog do a report on a company saying their system will pay for itself in 3 years?Photo_Stylus wrote: »Good idea but it needs to be cheap enough to pay for itself inside 5 years really.
Being a financial forum, a great deal of people here will be thinking solely of the financial return, but I think to do that, we need to factor in other things, which unfortunantly are not tangible. Such as:- Price of gas/oil - if these rise again, electrcity will rise
- Price of wind turbines - We will all have to pay for these eventually (even Darling has admitted that)
- Greed of electric companies - lets face it, if we are not protesting now about the price of electricity, it will never drop below todays price
- Price of dirty fuel - no doubt it is on the agenda we would have to pay for not having green electric
Also, assuming they continue to perform as they did last year, each unit over the 25 years will have cost less than 19p a unit.
So this is my target - if I can get electricity on average for 25 years for less than 19p, I've lost out financially. If electric goes up, I'm a winner. Though personally, I think I have had a victory already. My bills are lower, and I have an element of security in the future.0 -
retrocarclub wrote: »Are the panels covered under any type of warranty? i.e. if they break after 3 years, can you get them replaced?
Solar PV panels are well known to be very reliable - they don't have moving parts, so I don't think I'll be contacting them for a long long time (if ever).
If I broke one myself (i.e. through misadventure, natural disaster or accident), I could have just the broken panel removed and a new one slotted in, or just remove the broken one from the system altogether(the system can run with up to 2 less panels, or up to three more, so between 6 and 11 as I have 8 at the moment). I couldn't do this myself though, as I am not in the solar industry, or electrically trained, so there would be a cost involved.0 -
Mcif5dhc,
I think that everyone would agree that in getting any form of renewable energy, there are two issues; namely the 'Green' considerations and finance.
Your initial post only went into the latter issue and concentrated on Return on Investment(ROI) or payback periods.
As this is a money saving website, not unnaturally it is the financial issues that concern many people.
The difficulty, as you state in the latter posts, is that nobody has any idea what will happen to electricity prices in the long term.
The very fact that those like yourself getting large subsidies through the feed in tariffs, plus other green measures, will inevitably drive up prices - the media have been speculating on £200 per household.
Whilst this debate is interesting, IMO you have painted far too rosy picture on payback times. The points I have made above are still valid. e.g.
1. In England we get only £400 grant toward instalation, and will those continue when feed in tariffs start? Wales presumably get higher grants.
2. 15p/kWh costing is too high - 10p is more realistic.
3. The loss(or payment if a loan) of interest on the £7,500 capital required is a huge consideration when calculating any pay back time and must be taken into account. (whilst you got a year's grace borrowing with your credit card 'dodge', you are still going to have to pay interest after that year.) That makes your figures of 19p/kWh and £218 in post #12 meaningless.
4. The panels themselves should be trouble free, but the guarantee for the complete system - cables/electronics etc is how long - 2 years? 5 years?
Again as stated above I don't think at current prices, it is an economic proposition. If the predicted huge reductions in the price of solar panels materialize then things might change, but will the Government then cut the price of the feed-in tariff?0 -
The government is / was expected to introduce feed in tariffs at around 25p to 30p for all those exported. At least one person wants 'feed in tariffs' at around 38p for all units generated which is neither equitable nor the best way forward since it doesn't encourage producers to conserve energy.
Microgeneration has been criticized as being uneconomical and to that end it should focus on community level set ups to stimulate the market and possibly schools since they mostly stand empty for six or seven weeks in the summer. Managing such installations at the LEA level might be the way forward - since it is more affordable and the benefits can be shared between shools within the LEA or preferably reinvested.
There is an annual round of grants of up to £50,000 for such schemes I think based on matched funding.
Installing higher capacity I would imagine is far better than several lower capacity set-ups in terms of added equipment for exporting the energy and in erecting and maintaining the equipment.
PS FITS are expected to reduce with affordability of the equipment.0 -
Mcif5dhc,
The very fact that those like yourself getting large subsidies through the feed in tariffs, plus other green measures, will inevitably drive up prices - the media have been speculating on £200 per household.Whilst this debate is interesting, IMO you have painted far too rosy picture on payback times. The points I have made above are still valid. e.g.
1. In England we get only £400 grant toward instalation, and will those continue when feed in tariffs start? Wales presumably get higher grants.
2. 15p/kWh costing is too high - 10p is more realistic.
Happy to oblige, though I would call my entries 'fair' not rosy (I don't work in the solar industry, so I have nothing to gain). Using £400 grant, 10p a unit (for all the calculation), but all the other original figures you would get:
Initial Cost: £7950
Grant: £400
Units generated in one year: 1186
Feed-in-tariff: £432.89
Amount saved off bill (assuming each unit is 10p): £118.60
Annual saving: £551.49
Payback assuming everything stays the same: 13.7 years
(though I think 10p a unit on a long term basis is very very low)3. The loss(or payment if a loan) of interest on the £7,500 capital required is a huge consideration when calculating any pay back time and must be taken into account. (whilst you got a year's grace borrowing with your credit card 'dodge', you are still going to have to pay interest after that year.) That makes your figures of 19p/kWh and £218 in post #12 meaningless.4. The panels themselves should be trouble free, but the guarantee for the complete system - cables/electronics etc is how long - 2 years? 5 years?Again as stated above I don't think at current prices, it is an economic proposition. If the predicted huge reductions in the price of solar panels materialize then things might change, but will the Government then cut the price of the feed-in tariff?
And FITs will fall in time, as will hopefully solar panel costs.
I started this forum, because I have seen highly inaccurate payback times of 50+ years in the press, and these are false. At least with the numbers in this forum, people can make up their own mind.
It would be interesting to see what the small wind turbine owners come back with.
Thanks
Mcfi5dhc0 -
Happy to oblige, though I would call my entries 'fair' not rosy (I don't work in the solar industry, so I have nothing to gain). Using £400 grant, 10p a unit (for all the calculation), but all the other original figures you would get:
Initial Cost: £7950
Grant: £400
Units generated in one year: 1186
Feed-in-tariff: £432.89
Amount saved off bill (assuming each unit is 10p): £118.60
Annual saving: £551.49
Payback assuming everything stays the same: 13.7 years
I am sorry but this is where your calculations are absolutely wrong.
As I said above you simply cannot ignore the cost of borrowing the £7,550 or the loss of interest on that £7,550.
It is like saying I have a £100,000 mortgage at 6% interest and if I pay £5,000 per year it will be paid off in 20 years.
As said earlier £7,550 invested at 5% will realise £377.50(which will be compounded) and every likelyhood of rates increasing. It will cost you a lot more than that to borrow £7,550. You have to deduct those costs from your savings
So even assuming that your feed in tariff remains that high(doubtful) you are talking of a payback period of some 50 years. which makes the reports you have seen in the press about correct.
The other issue is the system guarantee. Only 2 years is a lot different to 25 years. It is inevitable that with cables, connectors and electronics that there will be failures and considerable costs to remedy. If it were not expected to have failures why ony a 2 year guarantee.
If it is like much of the 'small print' on solar I have seen they require an annual inspection.
We might have to agree to disagree!:beer:0 -
Mcif5dhc,
I think that everyone would agree that in getting any form of renewable energy, there are two issues; namely the 'Green' considerations and finance.
I wouldn't.
I would say there are three, the third of which you continually overlook.
Namely.................energy security."The problem with quotes on the internet is that you never know whether they are genuine or not" -
Albert Einstein0 -
Nearlynew
Totally agree with you
Also, I like the idea of npower/BG and co not having my money, and the tables being turned.
Thanks
Mcfi5dhc0 -
Solar
A £177.90 saving on a £5450 investment is giving you a return of 3.26%. There are many investments available which give you a higher return.
Also, I understand the efficiency of the cells may fall slightly as they age.
Ground Source Heat Pump
A good proportion of the electricity used to power your heat pump will be generated using CO2 generating fossil fuels at something like 35% efficiency. So you should take that into account when calculating the overall efficiency of the heat pump.
0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards