We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

UK house prices: history suggests it won't be until 2016 that they recover to pre-boo

124

Comments

  • HAMISH_MCTAVISH
    HAMISH_MCTAVISH Posts: 28,592 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    Well then they are bears :confused: not bulls :beer:

    :rotfl:

    Objectively speaking, I am bearish on the outlook for property in the short term, and bullish in the medium to long term.

    Philosophically speaking, I believe house price growth has benefits to society for as long as it can be maintained, ie, until population stops growing.

    But at the end of the day, I really don't care about anyone else so long as I make money, so all the rest is just noise.
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    :rotfl:

    Objectively speaking, I am bearish on the outlook for property in the short term, and bullish in the medium to long term.

    Agree with you on this point. As its the way the world works.....
  • The last time this happened in the 90s it was about 6 years before the bear market turned.

    So from 2007 the top we are about half way through.



    Houses have always gone from overvalued to undervaluedthroughout history. There is no reason this will change.

    In the 90s they went from overvalued to undervalued, it took about 6 years then they went to overvalued again. In 2007 they started on the turn just like always has happened. The line never goes stright one way, but in 3 years they should be near the bottom again.
  • The last time this happened in the 90s it was about 6 years before the bear market turned.

    So from 2007 the top we are about half way through.

    What's so special about the 90's?
    Why chose that correction and not any of the others?
    One thing for sure is that each correction is quite independant from each other.

    If you are adamant you wish to compare to the 90's, I can show that in some areas property prices fully recovered within one year, not 6 as you suggest.

    I can also show that this time, a similar percentage drop was achieved compared to the 90's but it was achieved in a shorter period.
    As it took a shorter period to reach the bottom, surely it's comprehendable that it may not take 6 years to fully recover nationwide.

    [edit]
    Oh wait a minute, noticed from you signature your a member of the 70% club :rotfl:
    [/edit]
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • Will there? I don't know that this is true. Last time around, prices rose by between 3% and 7% a year for the first few years of recovery. This year, prices have already risen by £9,000 since february.

    Last time around there was certainly not the shortage of supply, QE, lowest rates in history, etc, that we see today, all of which could spur recovery far faster than last time.

    This crash does seem to have been time compressed so far. I see no reason why the recovery would not be time compressed as well, given all the external factors at play such as low rates, QE, population growth, and a more severe (and getting worse) underlying shortage of housing than last time.

    And that was a HAMISH_MCTAVISH top tip.....:money:

    :D
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • doire_2
    doire_2 Posts: 2,280 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ad9898 wrote: »
    You know Hamish if the economic fundamentals were heading in the right direction I may agree with your above statement, the problem is they are not, they are just being staved off until the next election with QE and borrowed money, both of which will come to a grinding halt in the not too distant future, we are in the 'finger in the dam phase'. Let's see what happens over the next 12 months hey.


    No point in posting that mate. Bulls think the government have loads of money which will sort out this mess. :rolleyes: They also fail to see that labour are doing everything they can to get in for another term...and to hell with the consequences.
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker


    Houses have always gone from overvalued to undervaluedthroughout history. There is no reason this will change.

    I thought the 70's correction only lasted about a year :confused: Carry on Dreaming, could be film title with Babs icon7.gif
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • doire wrote: »
    No point in posting that mate. Bulls think the government have loads of money which will sort out this mess. :rolleyes: They also fail to see that labour are doing everything they can to get in for another term...and to hell with the consequences.

    No point u posting it either mate, he has long since been dead, cut off on his prime. Although I do have access to a Ouija Board if you want me to try and contact him and pass on a message.;)
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    No point u posting it either mate, he has long since been dead, cut off on his prime. Although I do have access to a Ouija Board if you want me to try and contact him and pass on a message.;)

    Are you there AD?????

    Are you there??????

    HSF stirs and in a different voice and mutters something about "peak oil" ;):D
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Employment rate at 92%
    Base rate at 0.5%
    Inflation at 2.9%

    Fundamentals look fine to me :confused:;)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.