UK Property to HALVE Between Now and July 29, 2010

lostinrates

Cleaver wrote: »

Sometimes I wish there was a button where you can thank a post twice. Mrs C just asked what I was smiling at.

(told her I was watching !!!!!! - less embarrassing that admitting you're on a forum).

Ah well, glad I made you feel better.;)

For me personally you can keep the holiday if its a choice :rotfl:

I've always liked the sound of Mrs C.

fc123

Cleaver wrote: »

Do you want my penis size as well woman?

It's not too bad! We're having three main hols and will probably have three weekends away. Maybe four.

No course not....;)

Cleaver

fc123 wrote: »

No course not....;)

I'll PM you.

fc123

cleaver wrote: »

i'll pm you.

o m g

julieq

As a matter of fact, size really doesn't matter. And indeed if it's too big it can actually stop you finishing.


(particularly if you're using the cryptic clues).

Sapphire

bendix wrote: »

I don't know what sort of journalism you read, but in my world journalism is about reporting facts.

Publishers, on the other hand, might come up with poorly written sensationalism supported by carefully selected 'expert' speculation (usually drafted by the fund managers' PR team to get their heroes into the press) to sell their crappy magazine.

What on earth are you talking about? It's journalists who tend to come up with poorly written sensationalism, etc., and they are employed by publishers. Publishers do not generally write articles themselves.

treliac

Sapphire wrote: »

What on earth are you talking about? It's journalists who tend to come up with poorly written sensationalism, etc., and they are employed by publishers. Publishers do not generally write articles themselves.

Thanks for bringing us back to .... well not really sure where .... but away from Cleaver's personal credentials! He 'raised' some interesting questions, but I decided not to ask them.

SilverStandard

Having read all the posts and just read the article, there hasnt been one solid dispute of the 5 points raised.

No point saying its a load of rubish without backing up your claim.

I for one think you cant dispute the reasons given.

StevieJ

SilverStandard wrote: »

Having read all the posts and just read the article, there hasnt been one solid dispute of the 5 points raised.

No point saying its a load of rubish without backing up your claim.

I for one think you cant dispute the reasons given.

Those five points have been discussed Ad Infinitum on here people defending and refuting. e.g. some believe that rising interest rates will do no more than shrink banks margins for new borrowers and return other borrowers to where they were in the past, time will tell. The points basically run through most of the threads on this board.

Graham_Devon

StevieJ wrote: »

Those five points have been discussed Ad Infinitum on here people defending and refuting. e.g. some believe that rising interest rates will do no more than shrink banks margins for new borrowers and return other borrowers to where they were in the past, time will tell. The points basically run through most of the threads on this board.

They run, because they cannot be disputed.

We don't have discussions about an oil slick creating house price falls because it can easily be disputed