who came in to power here?

JonnyBravo

geoffky wrote: »

so the 8 billion that has been paid back in the last year shows on the graph as that tiny fall at the top? oh dear!!!

hmmmm.... as we see here geoffrey's ability to interpet the graph is somewhat one dimensional.


How about if the average disposable income has gone up geoffrey?

Say if there were low interest rates?

Might that play a larger part?

:rolleyes:


p.s. the extra £8bn was repaid over the first 3 months of 2009 according to the articles I read

Hair_Bear

It's not Geoff's fault if you lot aren't cleaver enough to understand basic statistical representations of complex data.

System

This thread is gold

Cleaver

I wasn't having a go as such, I'm a bit of a geek and like charts and graphs. And I'm sure that one shows something. I'd just like to know what.

Cleaver

Hair_Bear wrote: »

It's not Geoff's fault if you lot aren't cleaver enough to understand basic statistical representations of complex data.

Ahhh, I see what you did there. Very clever. I mean, cleaver.

So go on then Care Bare, what exactly does the graph show?

geoffky

I maybe not that clever ..but i am clever enough not to have to work for a living having made it all before the age of 40....stupid me....I must now go out and buy ten btl to make me even more stupid...

JonnyBravo

geoffky wrote: »

I maybe not that clever ..but i am clever enough not to have to work for a living having made it all before the age of 40....stupid me....I must now go out and buy ten btl to make me even more stupid...

Ah..... willy waving..... nice touch.....

:rotfl:

I suppose there are plenty of people who don't work for a living.... what's your point?

Andy_L

Cleaver wrote: »

I'm afraid I can only get worried about it if I know exactly what it shows me. Otherwise we could all just make stuff up:



Notice how the upsurge starting in 2002 coincides with the boom of BTL. Bloody chancers. Scum, the lot of them.

You forgot to distort the vertical scale to make it look worse: amateur :-)

chewmylegoff

Andy_L wrote: »

You forgot to distort the vertical scale to make it look worse: amateur :-)

the vertical scale is distorted, but in the wrong direction, in order to make it look better. cleaver knows exactly what he's doing, the charlatan.

ess0two

Joeskeppi wrote: »

This thread is gold

Yeah a little bit of knowledge is dangerous,if knowledge was dynamite,Geoff would'nt have enough to blow his cap off.