We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Land Registry DOWN again in May.
Comments
-
didn't realise LR kept updating their figures after the monthly report. can't find much data on it but according to this press release: http://www1.landregistry.gov.uk/about%5Fus/pressoffice/notices/default.asp?article_id=20070 they have now revised their march figure down to -0.5 (-0.4 in their report) but revised april up to -0.2 (from -0.3).
swings and roundabouts.plus ça change........0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »Always happy to show you the facts Graham.
Past caring if you believe or understand them now.
Incidently, LR dont report my area. The figures are obtained from the registers of Scotland Executive Agency
Aberdeenshire
http://www.ros.gov.uk/pdfs/la_jan07.pdf = £158,207
http://www.ros.gov.uk/pdfs/la_apr_09.pdf = £178,486
My VI area is pretty close
Aberdeen
http://www.ros.gov.uk/pdfs/la_jan07.pdf = £148,488
http://www.ros.gov.uk/pdfs/la_apr_09.pdf = £154,670
I kind of understand the game now. Honestly, I do.
When the LR is down, we focus on our very own local areas. ...And Merthr Tydvil of course..
When the LR is up, it's back to focusing on a National Level and average prices vs average wage and how correlated they now are.
....well, I suppose Merthr Tydvil is now a little presumptious of me. I apologise.0 -
-
The fact of the matter is that prices are still crazy high for a lot of people who would have been able to buy 10 or so years ago if they were in the same circumstances they are in now .
But maybe not 20 years ago'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »See that makes no sense.
It doesnt matter what they are behind the halifax. I want to know how many months they are behind on their own reporting.
I want to know why I am told I don't understand, when quite frankly, it looks like the goalposts have just been moved?
Wheres Generali
Here I am! I've been at work today, training the next generation of economists and then took Mrs Generali out for lunch followed by a swim at the ITAC and then a couple of glasses of wine.
Ok. Haliwide numbers are calculated at the point of the mortgage being accepted - gazundering/gazumping are ignored for their figures AIUI.
Then there is a delay between mortgage finance being in place and completion, normally of about 4-6 weeks.
Then the LR has to process the sale which takes 2-3 months it would appear. This can be shown most easily by comparing LR numbers with Haliwide - they match each other pretty well if you lag LR by about 4 months.
PS Michael Jackson's body is having an autopsy to find blame for his death. The coroner has narrowed it to:
i. Sunshine
ii. Moonlight
iii. Good times or
iv. Boogie0 -
Then the LR has to process the sale which takes 2-3 months it would appear. This can be shown most easily by comparing LR numbers with Haliwide - they match each other pretty well if you lag LR by about 4 months.
Cheers Gen.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
Possibly not, but then that was the peak of the last boom if memory serves?
True, in 1990 you would have needed 65% of your income to pay the mortgage now it is 31% (average of course).'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
Tell you what Chucky, these Halifax stats are well handy'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards