We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Who should be able to buy property?
Comments
-
I voted everyone on a full time wage, the reason ?, the average wage should buy the average house (3 bed semi), this is how it always was before this particular bubble, as I've said before, I know because I did it !, so people on less than this should be be able to buy, terraced, 2 bed flats, 1 bed flats, depending on income.
People who shouldn't be able to buy, part time workers or benefit claimants, but that should be fairly obvious, I doubt no one in history has been able to buy a house working 16 hours a week a Macca's, and I wouldn't think they'd expect to either, unless of course money given to them helps their cause.
I'm not sure where you live but you have never been able to buy a 3 bed semi on an average wage where I live not unless you are moving from a smaller house and have some equity0 -
Personally, I don't think property ownership should be limited to the well off - after all, there are lots of extremely below average areas and properties.
I think in areas like London where only the far above average can afford to buy currently, prices will have to fall a long way until it hits normal affordability.
I agree, but I'm nto sure how you can legislate for this in a free market economy. It would have been nice if Labour had removed the tax breaks for BTLers, put up interest rates when house prices went crazy, increased stamp duty, but in reality they can only do so much to try and control the housing market. If they do too much then it becomes counter productive and hurts the people they're trying to help.
I certainly think home ownership is a priviledge to be earned rather than given."I can hear you whisperin', children, so I know you're down there. I can feel myself gettin' awful mad. I'm out of patience, children. I'm coming to find you now." - Harry Powell, Night of the Hunter, 1955.0 -
roseland69 wrote: »I think an average working couple on an average salary should, at the very least, be able to comfortably afford a modest 2 bed home. An average working single should comfortably afford a modest 1 bed home. To start off with. And as they progress up the career ladder, they should be able to trade up to a larger property when they can afford more.
If an average salary makes you just about able to buy a 2 bed home, then that still leaves home ownership realistically out of reach of average people. Remember that average salary means average for people of all ages - average young people without families won't have got an average way up the career ladder yet. And by the time they are an average way up the ladder - half way through their working lives, so in their early 40s - many of them won't fit into the homes this suggestion proposes - the couples with teenagers of both sexes who want at least 3 bedrooms, those who've had kids and then got divorced and now have a single income but wouldn't fit into a 1 bed home - and many other variations.
The only way home ownership can be within reach of average people is if you can buy a starter home (however defined) on the average salary of a person in their 20s or early 30s.
[I am not saying whether this is possible or desirable or how it should be achieved, or defining "average" or "starter home" or anything else, so please don't read into my post anything other than the specific point I'm trying to make.
]
ETA I agree with the rest of your post, though, roseland69Do you know anyone who's bereaved? Point them to https://www.AtaLoss.org which does for bereavement support what MSE does for financial services, providing links to support organisations relevant to the circumstances of the loss & the local area. (Link permitted by forum team)
Tyre performance in the wet deteriorates rapidly below about 3mm tread - change yours when they get dangerous, not just when they are nearly illegal (1.6mm).
Oh, and wear your seatbelt. My kids are only alive because they were wearing theirs when somebody else was driving in wet weather with worn tyres.
0 -
-
-
EveryoneI have voted for everybody. Why be mean spirited and indulge in a sort of reverse jealousy? More likely though the market will determine that in the future hard economic times make will make it difficult for large segments of the population to buy.0
-
Everyone with a full time wagekennyboy66 wrote: »Why you little..............
For interest, what do you consider urban & when were you last in Liverpool.
Having had second thoughts about my post I've deleted it, as it may have caused offense.0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards