maintenance if pwc and another man have baby

Zara33

mommarat wrote: »

Just been on the Child Maintenance options site and done a quick calculation and your MA should go down for each child that is not yours in your ex-partners household

I doubt that very much.

Zara33

A NRP will get a reduction in child support if the NRP has other children living in his/her house, not the PWC house.

mommarat

Zara33 wrote: »

I doubt that very much.

Sorry my new rules is rusty, you are right its extra child in nrp house but he still wouldn't be expected to pay for a child which wasn't his which I think was the original debate

mommarat

Since the recent changes in the CSA I don't think any changes matter concerning the pwc anyway do they under new rules. A friend of mine rang to say she had a change to report and was told she didn't need to tell the CSA anymore it is only NRP changes they are interested in

Zara33

mommarat wrote: »

Sorry my new rules is rusty, you are right its extra child in nrp house but he still wouldn't be expected to pay for a child which wasn't his which I think was the original debate

mommarat wrote: »

Just been on the Child Maintenance options site and done a quick calculation and your MA should go down for each child that is not yours in your ex-partners household

So i assume you didn't actually use the calculator, that your talking about in your post then because it's pretty clear.

mommarat

Zara33 wrote: »

So i assume you didn't actually use the calculator, that your talking about in your post then because it's pretty clear.

I did go to the calculator and read it incorrectly as it is the first time I have looked at it as in my personal life I have no need to use it. We all make mistakes

kelloggs36

Under the old rules, there would be 2 cases so the maintenance requirement would be split between them which would actually mean that the MR for child 1 would be LESS than it would have otherwise have been - so in answer to the original question no, the original NRP would not pay mre but could pay LESS but the worst case scenario is that it remained the same.

mommarat

kelloggs36 wrote: »

Under the old rules, there would be 2 cases so the maintenance requirement would be split between them which would actually mean that the MR for child 1 would be LESS than it would have otherwise have been - so in answer to the original question no, the original NRP would not pay mre but could pay LESS but the worst case scenario is that it remained the same.

I think I had my old rules head on when I posted earlier, because I knew there was a senario where the nrp ma would go down. All the new rules is based on is nrp income and % for the qc's

woody01

Blonde_Bint wrote: »

Who's the drunk, me or him (Stoke Fan)

pwc has a new child so the nrp needs to pay more because it costs more in the house.

I hope you are wrong.
The fella will end up paying for someone else's sprog (effectively) otherwise.

Blackpool_Saver

Yeah she is wrong, but wont be told