We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Burning Wood

2»

Comments

  • Ken68
    Ken68 Posts: 6,825 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Energy Saving Champion Home Insurance Hacker!
    Just had a look at some old pallets and the softwood slats are nailed to HARDWOOD 3"x3", so would have thought them ideal for burning. Looks like beech.
  • punamulta
    punamulta Posts: 193 Forumite
    In scandinavia they have always used softwood, they developed these wood burning brick storage heaters as early as the 17th century, you burn the wood in the small firebox for an hour or so, the flue goes several times round inside the brick construction,, the bricks heat up to 140 deg or so and heat the room for up to 10 hours after you shut the damper. i still use mine, its fantastic.

    link sorry not in english but pics tell it all,they must be fairly easy to build as the principle is simple.
    http://www.tiilirakenne.fi/index.html

    this site is in english and has state of the art softwood burners and info on the heat values of various woods http://www.tulikivi.com/www/homeeng.nsf/wwwframeset?OpenPage

    from their site, they reckon pine is better than oak!

    Effective thermal value of dry substance

    Wood kWh/kg
    Pine 5.3
    Fir 5.2
    Birch 5.3
    Alder 5.2
    Aspen 5.1
    Oak 5.1
  • peat
    peat Posts: 481 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    The figures on thermal value are interesting but it is a bit simplistic to say that pine is better fuel than oak. The basic density of the materials must be considered.
    Pine basic density .41
    oak basic density .56
    Therefore 1 cubic metre of pine would weigh 410kgs and produce 2173 kw
    1 cubic metre of oak would weigh 560kgs and produce 2856 kw.
    In practise moisture content is far more relevant than nominal thermal values of dry matter, you will never be dealing with totally dry matter.
  • punamulta
    punamulta Posts: 193 Forumite
    thanks for the density figures peat, i do notice the drying difference between this damp island compared to the extreme dry conditions back in finland, all the moisture is frozen out of the air once you get below -15 degC or so, this would make those dry wood heat values more relavent there.

    We do find that birch needs little or no drying and burns very hot, so hot in fact i have to mix it with spruce or pine or risk setting my log house on fire.
  • Interesting thread. OS advice for burning anything on an open fire: GET A FIREGUARD. Anything has the potential to spit when burning and you never know when, or if, it will do it, which is also why heathrugs were invented ;)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.