Mum jailed for three months after refusing to let ex see their daughter

Zara33

DUTR wrote: »

Condoms are not 100% effective (and reduce the beautiful feeling) just like other contraceptive (why do they make them so small?) :eek:

No they aren't 100% effective in fact nothing is, but something is better than nothing. As for the rest of your comment :rotfl:I'm walking away from it...

DUTR

Zara33 wrote: »

No they aren't 100% effective in fact nothing is, but something is better than nothing. As for the rest of your comment :rotfl:I'm walking away from it...

Walk or run? i pay csa you know

Zara33

DUTR wrote: »

Walk or run? i pay csa you know

I'm not disputing that, don't tke things said here on a personal level it's not worth it.

hamstercheeks_2

:rotfl::rotfl:

lol just laughing at one of my buddies everytime she uses a condom she says it comes out in shreds:eek:

either very vigouros s e x

or as she says "ah think ah've goat a pair o' scissors up there":rotfl::rotfl::T

DUTR

Zara33 wrote: »

I'm not disputing that, don't tke things said here on a personal level it's not worth it.

Don't I know it, especially when the lynch mob are online :eek:

hamstercheeks_2

DUTR wrote: »

Condoms are not 100% effective (and reduce the beautiful feeling) :A

lol an ex of mine used to say that using a condom was like having a bath with your socks on:rotfl::rotfl:

Zara33

DUTR wrote: »

Don't I know it, especially when the lynch mob are online :eek:

Have a pervy hug :grouphug: from me a member of said lynch mob (that's all those bitter pwc's who got traded in i'm guessing)

kelloggs36

DUTR wrote: »

With due respect kellogs , the thread is about a contact blocker getting locked up! read the original post, yes it has diverted onto other topics, I think my earlier post this evening was more balanced, where as your post seems to be an attack on NRPs again :eek:

I am aware of that, however I was referring to the posts which were talking about NRPs not having contact with their children.

kelloggs36

DUTR wrote: »

With due respect kellogs , the thread is about a contact blocker getting locked up! read the original post, yes it has diverted onto other topics, I think my earlier post this evening was more balanced, where as your post seems to be an attack on NRPs again :eek:

I am aware of that, however I was referring to the posts which were talking about NRPs not having contact with their children. No, it isn't an attack on NRPs in general, if you bother to read, it is an attack on NRPs who choose to walk away and face no financial or emotional responsibility for the children they leave behind.

DUTR

kelloggs36 wrote: »

I am aware of that, however I was referring to the posts which were talking about NRPs not having contact with their children. No, it isn't an attack on NRPs in general, if you bother to read, it is an attack on NRPs who choose to walk away and face no financial or emotional responsibility for the children they leave behind.

Aye, but not all NRPs are out of the frame for the reasons you put, just as not all PWcs are money grabbing witches , I'm reffering to the balance in your posts.
Naturally you can post what you wish and from whichever side of the fence you prefer and that I respect , even though I don't agree just as you don't agree some wont participate in the battle of the sexes whether children are concerned or not :A