We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Some Benefits should be given in forms of vouchers instead of cash
Comments
-
Not everyone on low incomes or benefits smoke/drink to excess nor have sky tv and latest 40" plasma, so why should they have vouchers and not able to make a choice for themselves, they are after all adults.0
-
will someone please tell me what I'm doing wrong.MiserlyMartin wrote: »I agree. Vouchers all the way instead of flat screen TV's
I'm on benefits right now but I don't have a flat screen tv or money to pi$$ up a wall.:eek::eek::eek:
where am I going wrong?
0 -
What is it with this board and flat screen tv.
I don't like them myself especially those horrible tacky ones you hang on the wall.Totally tasteless.0 -
Just one small question on that last post....what about those who had their children when they could afford it, had no inkling things were going to go horribly wrong etc.
You can be as sensible as you like and plan so very well for the future but it can still all go wrong and very quickly.
Hi Sue, we all know that things can go wrong, redundancy, illness, marriage breakdown, etc. That is why we have a welfare system, but it should be for when things go wrong, not a lifestyle choice. My main point is the taking of tax then making people claim it back in benefits. Why not just give people a proper tax-free allowance to begin with, based on their circumstances and dependants? How can it be right to take money from low earners with one hand, then give it back with the other? All this leads to an increasingly bloated public sector. I also don't agree with the child tax credits/ child benefit system. All benefits should be means tested, and not just handed out willy-nilly. I think it is ludicrous that a family with an income of say £30k, can get child tax credits. Surely, a proper tax threshold would negate any need for this?0 -
Must admit, I agree with you completely there!We made it! All three boys have graduated, it's been hard work but it shows there is a possibility of a chance of normal (ish) life after a diagnosis (or two) of ASD. It's not been the easiest route but I am so glad I ignored everything and everyone and did my own therapies with them.
Eldests' EDS diagnosis 4.5.10, mine 13.1.11 eekk - now having fun and games as a wheelchair user.0 -
I haven't read all this thread, but I am assuming noone has yet posted this young lady's story:
29-stone mum feeds her eight-month-old triplets McDonald’s:
http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scotsol/homepage/news/article2399352.ece
"Anyway they don’t always have junk food — sometimes I cook a microwave meal. "
"Leanne steers away from healthy foods in case it makes her tots anorexic".
"Leanne receives £140 a week tax credit, £42 a week child benefit and £45 family allowance. She spends the £227 on food and ten cigarettes a day."
Poor kids. Not much of a start in life is it?0 -
So its okay to pay some benefits in vouchers in the off chance these will be used to pay for there kids.
This is ill conceived idea and will penalise those who are responsible. I can see some selling these vouchers
What next employers paying vouchers to employees, unhealthy food and bad habits are not always attributed to people on benefits0 -
Below I agree but giving vouchers is not the solution.
How about education and giving people information and help
If you have been brought up on a bad diet giving vouchers will not change your lifstyleI haven't read all this thread, but I am assuming noone has yet posted this young lady's story:
29-stone mum feeds her eight-month-old triplets McDonald’s:
http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/scotsol/homepage/news/article2399352.ece
"Anyway they don’t always have junk food — sometimes I cook a microwave meal. "
"Leanne steers away from healthy foods in case it makes her tots anorexic".
"Leanne receives £140 a week tax credit, £42 a week child benefit and £45 family allowance. She spends the £227 on food and ten cigarettes a day."
Poor kids. Not much of a start in life is it?0 -
Some Councils will ask new housing tenants to go to Wilkinsons or B&Q, buy the paint and do the place up themselves.
They usually provide the ternant with vouchers in that regard - so there is a time and a place for vouchers - not becuase we don;t trust the person to go and blow the vouchers on something inappropriate but just becuase it is easier to give them £150 B&Q vouchers rather than having to check off receipts on an expense claim or having to send your own painters in at £50 p/hour.
There are also still food vouchers in circulation for those people to spend at supermarkets - but again, although they are called food vouchers, other non-food items can be bought such as frying pans, cutlery, etc.
Vouchers for all benefits? It's just demeaning to the many to attack a problem cuased by the few.
Robust screening procedures for beenfit claimants and tighter conditions and who can claim and when is the only way to fix the problem - but that will involve more staff (cost) and a few disgruntled people from various sectors of the media and community.Anger ruins joy, it steals the goodness of my mind. Forces me to say terrible things. Overcoming anger brings peace of mind, a mind without regret. If I overcome anger, I will be delightful and loved by everyone.0 -
You are missing the point, an employer CHOOSES to give an employee a salary in return for what the employee does. Taxpayers are FORCED to fund benefits and have no say in the matter, short of refusing to pay and possibly being put in prison.What next employers paying vouchers to employees, unhealthy food and bad habits are not always attributed to people on benefits0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
