Banks cancelling overdrafts

never-in-doubt

Borrowed from aron here: #14

angelicmary85

never-in-doubt wrote: »

LOL, that's funny...... he apparently has another username on here too - why do people bother, what a sad sad existence :mad:

Yeah it's beta89..it's a cracking read...you should go check him out!

never-in-doubt

whats funny is the guy has actually spent time and effort typing all this crap up - is he for real?

Ok, OP - if you genuinely want help then i'd suggest you start afresh and try to refrain from making it sound like you're trying to scam the bank. At the end of the day if you need help we will help, but not a chance in hell when you clearly want to scam the banks.

Try again and see how you get on, pick your words slightly better and think before you post something!

never-in-doubt

angelicmary85 wrote: »

Yeah it's beta89..it's a cracking read...you should go check him out!

Here: http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/search.html?searchid=57632361

inmypocketnottheirs

Hey Spanish, for someone who is so supposedly intelligent and knowledgable, how come you have a measly 7 grand debt that you cant pay off?

I'll have a guess as to the answer - 'ere's todo labia' (more or less translates to you're all mouth).

exel1966

never-in-doubt wrote: »

bit like you do, in other posts!......

I don't reply to TROLLS, except to tell them they are one. You on the other hand love to feed them regularly. They do say keep it in the family :rotfl:

nzseries1

inmypocketnottheirs wrote: »

I'll have a guess as to the answer - 'ere's todo labia' (more or less translates to you're all mouth).

Oh no... it's bad enough when people use "'s" incorrectly in English... but you've introduced a rogue apostrophe into a language that as a rule doesn't even use them.

Are the British not content butchering their own language and therefore they've moved to butchering others? ¡Que pena!

MABLE

Sorry but has to be said these people who have their overdraft withdrawn without notice or reduced no doubt have there ownselves to blame. My overdraft limit is £10,000 and Lloyds wrote stating I did not use it all and were going to reduce only because of that reason. They then went on say if I would like to keep the original limit they were happy to accomodate my request.

We only hear one side of the story and often the dear poster will put it in such away that they are completely innocent of any wrong doing.

Sorry posters pull the other one!

ahai1

I totally agree with you on this. The thing is that people have taken advantage of their overdraft and they feel it is free money. As I have said elsewhere I know of someone who was repeat offender and Woolwich now Barclays had enough and removed the overdraft. The thing is that this is going to develop into a MSE campaign like the one about the justified bank charges. Martin got that one wrong as he said we don't have free banking. The thing is we have free banking for people in credit. The thing is whilst I may disagree with banks on a number of things one thing that I do agree is that the customers have to play fair.

ShelfStacker wrote: »

Oh goody, another opportunity for people to whinge that a line of credit that was intended for short term use, that they were constantly up to or well into the limit of and was always billed and legally noted as being repayable on demand at any time, was taken away from them. As if MSE didn't have enough.

Overdraft misuse is a big problem, and one of the reasons we're in so much deep sh*t at the moment imho.

inmypocketnottheirs

nzseries1 wrote: »

Oh no... it's bad enough when people use "'s" incorrectly in English... but you've introduced a rogue apostrophe into a language that as a rule doesn't even use them.

Are the British not content butchering their own language and therefore they've moved to butchering others? ¡Que pena!

Hay que verguenza! No se que ha pasado! Eso es una cosa que mi fastidia mucha.