📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

It's true...worse than during the Great Depression !

Options
From Hansard :

§ The numbers of persons on the registers of the Employment Exchanges in this country were 2,762,219 at 31st August, 26 1931, and 2,741,306 at 23rd May, 1932.

Reported today :

Joblessness will eventually peak at 3.2 million in 2010, British Chamber of Commerce says (The Guardian)
«13

Comments

  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    It's true...worse than during the Great Depression !

    Yes, and amazingly the population of this great nation has remained exactly constant for the last 80 years as well :eek:
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • Reaper
    Reaper Posts: 7,354 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 8 April 2009 at 9:00AM
    You beat me to it.

    1931: 46 million
    Now: 61 million

    Source
  • gopher2
    gopher2 Posts: 15 Forumite
    edited 7 April 2009 at 10:59AM
    Presumably you could also add that up to 50% of the current figures could be women whereas in 1931 very few married women worked and the number listed as unemployed close to zero.
  • eeja
    eeja Posts: 374 Forumite
    purch wrote: »
    Yes, and amazingly the population of this great nation has remained exactly constant for the last 80 years as well :eek:

    Point taken purch.
    Of course there has been a huge change in the UK population make up since the 30's ! Millions died and were killed in the Second World War.
    More importantly there has been a huge emigration to Australia, Canada, New Zealand and also...yes to France, Portugal and Spain especially the Costas where many millions have retired to spend their final years.
    Set off against this is the huge immigration from the Indian Subcontinent (and the West Indies ).
    Nevertheless the figures quoted clearly show in my view the grave seriousness of the current and projected unemployment situation.
  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    Nevertheless the figures quoted clearly show in my view the grave seriousness of the current and projected unemployment situation

    Perfectly correct, and as we all know the number recorded as 'Unemployed' and the actual number of people on some form of state benefit and not working are hugely different !!!
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • paul5046
    paul5046 Posts: 326 Forumite
    8% unemployment now, 25% in the thirties. Secondly lots of people lost everything, and thirdly the governemnt did nothing thinking the market had the answer to everything.

    its nothing like the thirties.
  • eeja
    eeja Posts: 374 Forumite
    Reaper wrote: »
    You beat me to it.

    1941: 46 million
    Now: 61 million

    Source

    That is an increase of 30 percent in population .
    The official and projected figures given by Hansard and Chamber of Commerce is an increase of 20 percent.
    We are talking of a small fractional difference which only emphasises the seriousness of the unemployment situation.
    The population will certainly not increase by that 10% in the near future (and in fact could decrease due to Polish and other workers leaving in droves.) On the other hand the projected 3.2 million figure could easily increase by the 10 percent gap mentioned by December 2010 the way things are going at present with the UK economy.
  • gopher2
    gopher2 Posts: 15 Forumite
    What it does show is how misleading it can be to blindly compare stats with those of 78 years ago.

    The effects of similar figures would also be different. Now most households have two incomes so there will be some cushioning. The various unemployment benefits and child allowances are also likely to be higher so the unemployed will still have some spending capacity to help the economy.

    Nonetheless, while the figures for the UK remain below those of the US and most of Europe, they are very scary.
  • paul5046
    paul5046 Posts: 326 Forumite
    gopher2 wrote: »
    Nonetheless, while the figures for the UK remain below those of the US and most of Europe, they are very scary.

    No worse that the early eighties.
  • gopher2
    gopher2 Posts: 15 Forumite
    paul5046 wrote: »
    No worse that the early eighties.

    Which as I remember were also very scary.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.