We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Defined contract order..

13»

Comments

  • Still not found what I was looking for (and those vampire slayers are very distracting ...) but I did stumble on this.

    http://www.family-justice-council.org.uk/system_children.htm

    I may need a little time. I know I'll find what I'm looking for eventually, after all, as they say, The Truth Is Out There.

    Hang on, that was a different series. Mind you, that Agent Scully ...
    Information is not knowledge.
    Knowledge is not wisdom.
    Wisdom is not truth.
    Truth is not beauty.
    Beauty is not love.
    Love is not music.
    Music is the best.
  • koolmummy
    koolmummy Posts: 172 Forumite
    GG is right there have been 2 very well publicized cases where residence has been transferred to fathers when the resident mother has frustrated contact habitually.

    There have been some recent changes in children's act proceedings, since 08/12/08 all contact orders have a warning notice attached detailing the sanctions that a court can impose on a party who does not comply with an order.
    Non compliant parties can be fined, ordered to pay financial losses to the contact parent such as the cost of a missed holiday,ordered to do community service, imprisioned and have residency transferred.
    The process for enforcing a contact order is now much simpler that the old enforce the order/penal notice route. Hopefully they will be more succesful. The courts are always loathed to imprison a resident parent when it can be argued that it is contrary to the child's interests.
    DONT use solicitors, worst case scenario you could be facing a year of litigation and spending I.R.O £10,000. Solicitors WILL prolong the litigation, you can D.I.Y.

    Join FNF, they have great meetings in Brighton and are very helpful and supportive.FNF have a list of McKenzie friends - lay people who can assist you with the case, who charge much less than solicitors.

    Good luck
  • koolmummy
    koolmummy Posts: 172 Forumite
    P.M'd you Rebe
  • LizzieS_2
    LizzieS_2 Posts: 2,948 Forumite
    The only thing they don't tell you is that they won't put financial costs onto a pwc on benefits - legal aid will not foot the bill and the pwc is deemed on minimum income (been there as a nrrp).
  • Rebe
    Rebe Posts: 133 Forumite
    So given my OH's ex is oon benefits, if she still refused contact (with order) they couldn't fine her? Is that what you mean?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.