Slopping Out Prisons?

clareyocs

:T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T

emmzy wrote: »

i dont know, i dont even care if we get it or not i just thought seeing as he is entitled to it why not its fair enough saying if he didnt go to prison he wouldnt have had to do it but then theres all you people claiming back bank charges if you didnt go over your agreed limit you wouldnt have been charged yet its not legal and your entitled to the money back for it same as this

:T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T :T

Rustvaar

emmzy wrote: »

i dont know, i dont even care if we get it or not i just thought seeing as he is entitled to it why not its fair enough saying if he didnt go to prison he wouldnt have had to do it but then theres all you people claiming back bank charges if you didnt go over your agreed limit you wouldnt have been charged yet its not legal and your entitled to the money back for it same as this

Well said.

dmg24

emmzy wrote: »

i dont know, i dont even care if we get it or not i just thought seeing as he is entitled to it why not its fair enough saying if he didnt go to prison he wouldnt have had to do it but then theres all you people claiming back bank charges if you didnt go over your agreed limit you wouldnt have been charged yet its not legal and your entitled to the money back for it same as this

I cannot believe that you are comparing those who have incurred bank charges to criminals (that is what your OH is - a CRIMINAL). That is a petty argument, and also one that does not apply to many of us - I have never incurred a bank charge, so certainly have not claimed any back.

Perhaps your OH should think of his past as a learning experience, and not a means of making a fast buck? :rolleyes: