PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Tenants - PLEASE take out CONTENTS INSURANCE - BURGLARY

I just wanted to post this as a warning to tenants. If one tenant reads this and decides to take out insurance and avoid heartache then it will be worth it.

A property I manage was burgled late Saturday night, early hours of Sunday.

The tenant was not insured and they have lost pretty much everything of value that they own. They have also lost something of extreme sentimental value.

The burglars have managed to get through a metal security gate on the front door and have literally kicked in the UPVC door having smashed the external security light outside. They've carted away a 32inch TV amongst things and no-one saw a thing :rolleyes:

As a landlord I can only advise tenants on taking out contents insurance but I can't force them to do so. In times like this where money is tight, insurance seems like it a non essential but please ask yourself whether you can afford to lose all your worldly possessions. A basic contents policy doesn't need to cost a lot of money.

A landlord cannot and does not insure the tenant's contents.

This property was secure but the burglars were determined to get in. :mad: I've spent today dealing with it and it's really unpleasant.

The same message should also apply to homeowners.

Comments

  • poppysarah
    poppysarah Posts: 11,522 Forumite
    Secure but determined to get in generally means it's smackhead land or it's personal.
  • paintpot
    paintpot Posts: 764 Forumite
    poppysarah wrote: »
    Secure but determined to get in generally means it's smackhead land or it's personal.

    I wouldn't describe it as either to be honest. It's not an affluent area by any means. Some houses in the area have metal security gates but not all. Tenant has been in a while. It's slightly out of the way compared to others hence more easily targetable but that's why it has a security gate and floodlight.

    I have no reason to cast aspersions on the tenant. He's been superb.

    However, I don't have the mindset of a burglar. They are scum of the earth
  • paintpot wrote: »
    I wouldn't describe it as either to be honest. It's not an affluent area by any means. Some houses in the area have metal security gates but not all. Tenant has been in a while. It's slightly out of the way compared to others hence more easily targetable but that's why it has a security gate and floodlight.

    I have no reason to cast aspersions on the tenant. He's been superb.

    However, I don't have the mindset of a burglar. They are scum of the earth


    What they are saying is if someone causes that much damage to a property to rob it they are either drugged, drunk or its personal (ie tenant owed money or upset someone).

    & to be honest, I agree with them.

    A "normal" thief is not going to want to draw that much attention to themselves at the scene.
    Not Again
  • paintpot
    paintpot Posts: 764 Forumite
    Yes, I understand that. I don't disagree but I don't think it's directed at the tenant and I'm not naive. I could be proved wrong so more likely the former. Plus there was no malicious damage caused inside so hence leading me away from the "personal" aspect.

    Whatever, I don't want it to detract from the point of my post.
    What they are saying is if someone causes that much damage to a property to rob it they are either drugged, drunk or its personal (ie tenant owed money or upset someone).

    & to be honest, I agree with them.

    A "normal" thief is not going to want to draw that much attention to themselves at the scene.
  • poppysarah
    poppysarah Posts: 11,522 Forumite
    Indeed. Contents insurance is a good idea for everyone.
  • RetroBob
    RetroBob Posts: 171 Forumite
    We were burgled at uni, we had insurance and it was fine. My room door was locked so they got nothing of mine though :)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.