We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Public sector monster needs to be tamed
Comments
-
On Panorama last night they claimed that £1 in every £5 going towards Public Sector spending is for Pensions...........and its not going to decrease is it.
Having finally got round to iPlaying the prog, Panorama said the Tax Payers Alliance claimed it. However as said before (possibly in this very thread) the TPA are being disingenuous.
Their claim is that local gov pensions account for 20% of your CT bill, implying that abolishing them would reduce your bill by a 1/5th. However that assumes that only CT is used to pay the pension, none of the money from business rates, Central gov etc is used to pay them.0 -
Having finally got round to iPlaying the prog, Panorama said the Tax Payers Alliance claimed it. However as said before (possibly in this very thread) the TPA are being disingenuous.
Their claim is that local gov pensions account for 20% of your CT bill, implying that abolishing them would reduce your bill by a 1/5th. However that assumes that only CT is used to pay the pension, none of the money from business rates, Central gov etc is used to pay them.
As has been said before, the whole thing is very complex. Both how it is funded, the problems with the schemes, the costs of changing these schemes and any possible solution are all tremendously complex.
But acknowledging that doesn't make for good daily mail headlines or forum rant fodder.If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for anything0 -
donaldtramp wrote: »Yup, and waving our hard earned tax in our faces.
Reading your threads it could easily be thought that public sector workers don't pay and tax or any pension contributions - we simply get money handed out to us :rolleyes:0 -
-
Here's a good one - independant pensions consultant (partner at PwC) says even the funded LGP schemes are facing a £100bn funding deficit as the funding only covers 57% of potential liabilities.
Local Gov't Minister says they are "fair and affordable" - obviously for scheme members but NOT council taxpayer in general as the underfunding represents a potential annual additional CT of 15-30%.
http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news_details.cfm?News_id=60050
Hopefully the Government in power after the next election will have a serious look at the affordability of these and the unfunded public schemes.
Before anyone gets on at me - I'm quite happy that these schemes continue PROVIDED we have same schemes in private sector. That means private employers being obliged to pay 20% into employees pensions.....just think what that will do to inflation and unemployment. There would probably need to be protectionism to preserve jobs within the UK !!!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards