📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

What is an investment bond?

2

Comments

  • shaz_mum_of__2
    shaz_mum_of__2 Posts: 2,010 Forumite
    Thanks Guys

    I think its been up and running since 1994 and last years statement was much higher so possibly a long term investment as you say for hubby and his brother.

    She doesn't need it at the moment so let sleeping dogs lie i think ,am i right in thinking it is protected should she need nursing care in the future ?

    Shaz
    *****
    Shaz
    *****
  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,649 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    She doesn't need it at the moment so let sleeping dogs lie i think ,am i right in thinking it is protected should she need nursing care in the future ?

    Shaz

    As it's been up and running for so long then yes it's protected as there is no way you could have been seeing to do it to prevent being used for care 15 years ago.
  • whiteflag_3
    whiteflag_3 Posts: 1,395 Forumite
    jem16 wrote: »
    As it's been up and running for so long then yes it's protected as there is no way you could have been seeing to do it to prevent being used for care 15 years ago.

    time doesnt matter, investment bonds are not taken into consideration when assessing benefits for long term care.
  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,649 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    whiteflag wrote: »
    time doesnt matter, investment bonds are not taken into consideration when assessing benefits for long term care.

    They can be if it seems like they were taken out purely to prevent funds being used for care costs. It's called deprivation of assets.
  • Stavros_3
    Stavros_3 Posts: 1,288 Forumite
    whiteflag wrote: »
    Easy!!! stavros are you saying was worth 50K now worth 60p, now I know things are bad and its a St James Place bond but thats a bit over the top.

    Apologies, but the posting wasn't clear soz
    Liquidity is when you look at your investment portfolio and **** your pants
  • whiteflag_3
    whiteflag_3 Posts: 1,395 Forumite
    jem16 wrote: »
    They can be if it seems like they were taken out purely to prevent funds being used for care costs. It's called deprivation of assets.

    apparently they are not , they are treated as insurance policies
  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,649 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    whiteflag wrote: »
    apparently they are not , they are treated as insurance policies

    Apparently they are;


    Deprivation of assets
    It is important that individuals understand the powers that local authorities have to include in the means testing assessment assets that they consider to have been subject to ‘deliberate deprivation’. A definition used by Age Concern is that “deliberate deprivation occurs when a resident transfers an asset out of his or her possession in order to put him or herself in a better position to obtain assistance”. The Department of Health’s Charging for Residential Accommodation Guide (CRAG) gives the following examples of deprivation:

    • a lump sum payment such as a gift or to pay off a debt;

    • transferring the title deeds of a property to someone else;

    • putting money into a trust that cannot be revoked;

    converting money into another form that has to be disregarded from the means test, e.g. personal possessions, investment bonds with life insurance;

    • reducing capital through substantial expenditure on items such as expensive holidays or by extravagant living.
  • Myrmidon_J
    Myrmidon_J Posts: 287 Forumite
    jem16 wrote:

    Apparently they are...

    converting money into another form that has to be disregarded from the means test, e.g. personal possessions, investment bonds with life insurance;

    I can confirm (from experience) that Jem16 is correct. A client of ours (I work for an IFA) was caught out in this manner - the council in question quoted the above and didn't hurry to return any further mail.

    You might (might) be able to argue your case, but the chances of success are probably limited just now. However, in the OP's case - as the bond was taken out so long ago - there should be no "case" to answer.
    For the avoidance of doubt: I work for an IFA.
  • whiteflag_3
    whiteflag_3 Posts: 1,395 Forumite
    jem16 wrote: »
    Apparently they are;


    Deprivation of assets
    It is important that individuals understand the powers that local authorities have to include in the means testing assessment assets that they consider to have been subject to ‘deliberate deprivation’. A definition used by Age Concern is that “deliberate deprivation occurs when a resident transfers an asset out of his or her possession in order to put him or herself in a better position to obtain assistance”. The Department of Health’s Charging for Residential Accommodation Guide (CRAG) gives the following examples of deprivation:

    • a lump sum payment such as a gift or to pay off a debt;

    • transferring the title deeds of a property to someone else;

    • putting money into a trust that cannot be revoked;

    converting money into another form that has to be disregarded from the means test, e.g. personal possessions, investment bonds with life insurance;

    • reducing capital through substantial expenditure on items such as expensive holidays or by extravagant living.

    yes, although i think we are not taking about the same thing here. You are taking about deliberate deprivation and theres no doubt that if long term care was looking like a possibility and all your more was put in an investment bond it would be veiwed as deliberate deprivation as discribed above.

    However my understanding is if someone has held an investment bond through the normal course of organising their financial affairs then they are not taken into account if long term care is required.
  • whiteflag_3
    whiteflag_3 Posts: 1,395 Forumite
    jem16 wrote: »
    They can be if it seems like they were taken out purely to prevent funds being used for care costs. It's called deprivation of assets.
    sorry Jem i should have read this properly the first time. looks like we are on a similar wave length.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.