We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Shortfall of 1m homes by 2010 could send prices soaring when recovery comes, says Pre

NHMB: Shortfall of 1m homes by 2010 could send prices soaring when recovery comes
The underlying shortage of homes in England could reach "dangerously high" levels of more than 1 million in less than two years, according to David Pretty CBE, Chairman of the New Homes Marketing Board. His concerns were covered in articles across the national, regional and trade media.
While the property market is likely to remain depressed for some time, it will in due course gradually improve when more mortgage funding becomes available. This pent-up demand will then be released into a market unable to satisfy the nation's housing needs, says Mr Pretty, potentially sending prices surging back upwards:
"There is a very real possibility that property prices, which have fallen 15% or more, could rise back to 2007 levels within five years. These sort of pressures invariably happen to any market when demand far outstrips available supply.
"Even before the current recession, national housing production was well below previous decades. Today, we are in a far more difficult situation. The reality is that we are forming households at the rate of around 230,000 each and every year - that is the level we need to meet. But we haven't built in anywhere near those quantities for many years, so we now have a serious backlog which continues to build up.
"Back in 2004 the estimated shortage was around 450,000 homes. As we have only been building, at best, an average of around 160,000 per year in the last decade - a figure which is likely to collapse this year and next to around 75,000 a year - the arithmetic is stark: by 2010, pent-up demand for homes to buy, to rent and for social housing could well be over 1 million, and that is dangerously high.":rotfl::T
«13

Comments

  • chewmylegoff
    chewmylegoff Posts: 11,469 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    dgl1001 wrote: »
    NHMB: Shortfall of 1m homes by 2010 could send prices soaring when recovery comes
    The underlying shortage of homes in England could reach "dangerously high" levels of more than 1 million in less than two years, according to David Pretty CBE, Chairman of the New Homes Marketing Board. His concerns were covered in articles across the national, regional and trade media.
    While the property market is likely to remain depressed for some time, it will in due course gradually improve when more mortgage funding becomes available. This pent-up demand will then be released into a market unable to satisfy the nation's housing needs, says Mr Pretty, potentially sending prices surging back upwards:
    "There is a very real possibility that property prices, which have fallen 15% or more, could rise back to 2007 levels within five years. These sort of pressures invariably happen to any market when demand far outstrips available supply.
    "Even before the current recession, national housing production was well below previous decades. Today, we are in a far more difficult situation. The reality is that we are forming households at the rate of around 230,000 each and every year - that is the level we need to meet. But we haven't built in anywhere near those quantities for many years, so we now have a serious backlog which continues to build up.
    "Back in 2004 the estimated shortage was around 450,000 homes. As we have only been building, at best, an average of around 160,000 per year in the last decade - a figure which is likely to collapse this year and next to around 75,000 a year - the arithmetic is stark: by 2010, pent-up demand for homes to buy, to rent and for social housing could well be over 1 million, and that is dangerously high.":rotfl::T

    i stopped reading at the point highlighted above.
  • baby_boomer
    baby_boomer Posts: 3,883 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    dgl1001 wrote: »
    Chairman of the New Homes Marketing Board
    This is the most important part of your post ;)
  • BenL
    BenL Posts: 3,189 Forumite
    This is the most important part of your post ;)

    I love it!
    I beep for Robins - Beep Beep
    & Choo Choo for trains!!
  • fatpig_2
    fatpig_2 Posts: 631 Forumite
    dgl1001 wrote: »
    NHMB: Shortfall of 1m homes by 2010 could send prices soaring when recovery comes
    The underlying shortage of homes in England could reach "dangerously high" levels of more than 1 million in less than two years, according to David Pretty CBE, Chairman of the New Homes Marketing Board. His concerns were covered in articles across the national, regional and trade media.
    While the property market is likely to remain depressed for some time, it will in due course gradually improve when more mortgage funding becomes available. This pent-up demand will then be released into a market unable to satisfy the nation's housing needs, says Mr Pretty, potentially sending prices surging back upwards:
    "There is a very real possibility that property prices, which have fallen 15% or more, could rise back to 2007 levels within five years. These sort of pressures invariably happen to any market when demand far outstrips available supply.
    "Even before the current recession, national housing production was well below previous decades. Today, we are in a far more difficult situation. The reality is that we are forming households at the rate of around 230,000 each and every year - that is the level we need to meet. But we haven't built in anywhere near those quantities for many years, so we now have a serious backlog which continues to build up.
    "Back in 2004 the estimated shortage was around 450,000 homes. As we have only been building, at best, an average of around 160,000 per year in the last decade - a figure which is likely to collapse this year and next to around 75,000 a year - the arithmetic is stark: by 2010, pent-up demand for homes to buy, to rent and for social housing could well be over 1 million, and that is dangerously high.":rotfl::T
    Those jokers are like a broken record. They should be putting their money where their mouthes are and building as many homes as they can now then and then they'll be able to cash in 2010.
  • cocktail
    cocktail Posts: 377 Forumite
    there is an element of truth in the statement though.
    its a different matter that people agree or disagree based on what they like to hear.
  • stevetodd
    stevetodd Posts: 1,016 Forumite
    cocktail wrote: »
    there is an element of truth in the statement though.
    quote]

    You mean it was 'based on a true story'
  • adr0ck
    adr0ck Posts: 2,376 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    fatpig wrote: »
    Those jokers are like a broken record. They should be putting their money where their mouthes are and building as many homes as they can now then and then they'll be able to cash in 2010.

    are you providing the finance for them to do so?

    if not can you advise where they will get the finance to build them?

    or are you (to use your language) a joker?
  • cocktail
    cocktail Posts: 377 Forumite
    no, i meant the demand and supply situation.
  • lostinrates
    lostinrates Posts: 55,283 Forumite
    I've been Money Tipped!
    cocktail wrote: »
    no, i meant the demand and supply situation.


    In our parish council area, of three related hamlets/villages only about 12 of the households are under 35 (including us in this, although its my parents home, and they are pension age) A conservative guess is that half are 60+. It would be uncharitable thing to guess the age after that and I'd rather not think about which of my neighbours might make housing available soon, but the cold winter made me worry for more than a few. :(

    While I respect this is not representative of many areas we are an aging population.
  • So the "New Homes Marketing Board" reckons we will soon need to market new homes?:rolleyes:
    Not really news is it?:cool:
    Nothing is foolproof, as fools are so ingenious! :D
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 261.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.