We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Is the BBC Avoiding Critical Topics Like U.K Bankruptcy?

13468924

Comments

  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    IIRC Redwood produced a report and the Conservatives then rejected the recommendations.

    Oh go on then :D

    The review was in fact published last year,
    Mortgage Regulation: We see no need to continue to regulate the provision of mortgage finance, as it is the lending institutions rather than the client taking the risk.
    Given the number of occasions taxpayers in the UK and other countries have since had to bail out institutions laid low by their mortgage policies, it’s perhaps no surprise that some Conservatives want to distance themselves from the views of John Redwood and their own party’s policy commission. But the policy review was set up by David Cameron, and George Osborne gave advice on the writing and presentation of the report.
    http://www.libdemvoice.org/michael-howard-slates-john-redwood-over-financial-regulation-5009.html
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • harryhound
    harryhound Posts: 2,662 Forumite
    Masomnia wrote: »
    I think it means the average man, woman and child. I'm certainly not living that far beyond my means. Inaccurate English is a good mark of sensationalized journalism.

    Exactly, that is what average means. For every one overpaying there must be another underpaying.
    I very much doubt there are many babies running a deficit of 400 GBP per month but perhaps their parents are contributing a share of over 1000 GBP per month?!?
    "Where shall we go for our holidays in the 4x4 this year to spend the bonus Gordon Brown has stumped up with printed money?"

    It makes you proud to be a member of the bottom three countries in the world - Fore heaven's sake even Argentina is managing to wash its face in comparison to our bombed out economy.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_current_account_balance.
  • harryhound wrote: »
    It makes you proud to be a member of the bottom three countries in the world - Fore heaven's sake even Argentina is managing to wash its face in comparison to our bombed out economy.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_current_account_balance.
    That table is a little misleading cause it doesn't take into account the size of the U.K economy or our population etc. So in real terms we aren't 3rd from bottom.

    But I'd agree we are certainly not in a good position and our current account balance is shameful.
  • bo_drinker
    bo_drinker Posts: 3,924 Forumite
    The politically correct BBC again skirting issues ?? Steve Wright would not say recession until recently, he kept calling it an "R" . TW4T.
    I came in to this world with nothing and I've still got most of it left. :rolleyes:
  • Cleaver
    Cleaver Posts: 6,989 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    chrisweb wrote: »
    I feel the BBC is for some reason or other avoiding critical facts that the public has a right to know. If people were more educated and this sort of info came out in the first place a lot of people would have been saved from negative equity.

    I really like the BBC. I think their website, sports coverage, radio 4 and other bits and bobs are ace. I probably only really enjoy around 10 to 20% of their total output but that's easily enough to justify my fee.

    I also don't really expect the BBC to 'educate' me. I'd like them to challenge and inform me a bit more, but not educate.

    I have heard your conspiracy theory that BBC is 'avoiding critical facts' (and it is a conspiracy theory) before, and I've always wondered how they would implement this. They have tens of thousands of employees and if they tried to 'cover something up', or hide information it would be human nature of employees (especially journos) to reveal the truth.

    Having said all of the above, I would happily put the man who produced 'Hole In The Wall' against a wall and throw oranges at him.
  • amcluesent
    amcluesent Posts: 9,425 Forumite
    The BBC has already splurged £250,000 of our tax money in keeping their Balen report on biased reporting secret (Balen likely agree they favour Palestinians vs Israelis). Shows their attitude to keeping the public informed.

    Of course the BBC is institutionally left leaning, all recruitment is from Gaurdian readers, Peston is son of a Labour peer, Marr is married to lefty journalist, Wark holidays with Labour worthies, Humphreys wuves Mr Gordon etc. etc. Then there's the many and varied links to the secretive Common Purpose (Peston again).

    That left bias combines with journalists who are not very good; mostly the F-factor women on the news who are clueless on the real issues.
  • Cleaver
    Cleaver Posts: 6,989 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    amcluesent wrote: »
    The BBC has already splurged £250,000 of our tax money in keeping their Balen report on biased reporting secret (Balen likely agree they favour Palestinians vs Israelis). Shows their attitude to keeping the public informed.

    Of course the BBC is institutionally left leaning, all recruitment is from Gaurdian readers, Peston is son of a Labour peer, Marr is married to lefty journalist, Wark holidays with Labour worthies, Humphreys wuves Mr Gordon etc. etc. Then there's the many and varied links to the secretive Common Purpose (Peston again).

    That left bias combines with journalists who are not very good; mostly the F-factor women on the news who are clueless on the real issues.

    Now you mention it, I was watching 'Match Of The Day' last week and I could have sworn that the face of Arthur Scargill was mowed in to the pitch at Old Trafford. Maybe there's more to this conspiracy than meets the eye.

    On a serious note, I honestly don't spot any political leanings at the BBC that are particulary sinister. I agree, they are a bit left-leaning in the way that they seem constantly worried about offending people and you just know they have around 6,300 people working in their equality and diversity department. But I don't really notice any of this when I listen to their news or read their news website.
  • amcluesent
    amcluesent Posts: 9,425 Forumite
    > But I don't really notice any of this when I listen to their news or read their news website.<

    LOL. I believe it's called 'preaching to the converted'. ;)
  • Cleaver
    Cleaver Posts: 6,989 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    amcluesent wrote: »
    > But I don't really notice any of this when I listen to their news or read their news website.<

    LOL. I believe it's called 'preaching to the converted'. ;)

    Okay. Thought we might actually have a debate about the issue for a moment there, my apologies.

    I don't consider myself easily swayed by these things. I pretty much convinved that ITV and C4 are on a mission to dumb us down until we bleed, I am woefully suspicous of many large corporations and would walk miles to visit a shop other than Tesco. I think Westlife were created purely to take over children's minds so that they can be branded to later in life and I think the formulaic 'X Factor' promotes uniformity, blandness and mediocrity in a way that even the Nazi party would be jealous.

    But I still think the BBC news, sport and some radio coverage is pretty ace and not majorly biased. And I like you Mr Cluesent, so it'd be nice to debate the evidence rather than just talking about 'secretive groups' or just stating that I'm somehow ignorant.
  • mewbie_2
    mewbie_2 Posts: 6,058 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Is the BBC Avoiding Critical Topics Like U.K Bankruptcy
    It may be more that they wouldn't notice a critical topic if it sat itself in the chair and tried to read the news for them. Probably a bit of conspiracy AND cockup. Dumbing down, Dancing on Ice, that sort of thing.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.