We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Petrol vs Diesel Cost Debate

13

Comments

  • DGJsaver
    DGJsaver Posts: 2,777 Forumite
    Bongedone wrote: »
    Have you heard of particulate filters ?


    Have you heard of cars being over 5 years old ?
  • pault123 wrote: »
    A 150 bhp Petrol (more horse power is needed in petrol for equivalent power) will do the 0-60 yet

    Erm why would a 130bhp diesel engined car out-perform a 130bhp petrol engined car in a 0-60 race (presuming identical weights)?
  • DGJsaver
    DGJsaver Posts: 2,777 Forumite
    Bongedone wrote: »
    Have you heard of particulate filters ?


    "Diesel emissions from road transport are by far the biggest single cause of air quality legal breaches," says Simon Birkett, chair of the cross-party Campaign for Clean Air in London. He urges mayor Johnson and the government to take radical action to meet the demands of the new EU air quality directive, which is due to come into force very shortly and will require the UK to achieve much higher air quality standards for emissions of particulates by 2011.
    "Unless the government sets, belatedly and soon, national standards for the abatement of emissions of oxides of nitrogen from older diesel vehicles of all main types, these vehicles must be banned from the most polluted parts of London if the UK is to comply with air quality laws," Birkett says. He wants to see all car advertisements show, in grams per kilometre, the emissions of the hazardous oxides of nitrogen and particulate matter, as well as carbon dioxide emissions.


    From ;

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/may/14/carbonemissions.climatechange


    As i said , not everyone rides around in the latest models...
  • BillScarab
    BillScarab Posts: 6,027 Forumite
    pault123 wrote: »
    From a second hand buyers point of view I have to disagree with buying petrol.

    Say I want to buy a car, I have a budget in mind say £3000. I look at all my options at this price, I don't see a petrol for £3000 and then think "oh i would prefer a diesel I'll put my budget up to £5000 because it cost that much more originally!"

    I find a diesel for £3000 simple.

    The difference though is Torque. Bucket loads of Torque. The car pulls at 2000 revs to a degree a petrol could only dream of. Changing down a gear isn't required for overtaking like a petrol, simply put foot down and the Turbo kicks in. The refinement of a modern diesel engine is stunning, after driving a vw/audi TDI engine petrol's feel very clumsy.

    The biggest difference in a second hand diesel vs a petrol is performance overall. A 130 bhp 1.9 turbo diesel will do 0-60 in 8 seconds and pull on the motorway like a bullet train yet return a frugal 47-60 mpg.

    A 150 bhp Petrol (more horse power is needed in petrol for equivalent power) will do the 0-60 yet with a lot more revs needed and return a pathetic 20-30 mpg.

    Sorry but second hand buying a diesel wins.

    For brand new car buying then I think your mad! :p

    Modern diesels may be more refined than older ones but more refined than petrol engines? I think not.

    Also I'm not sure why you think more horse power is needed in a petrol car for 'equivalent power'. Modern petrol engines tend to develop their power higher in the rev range so need revving more but power is power. Gearing may make a difference though.

    Here's an exmpla to refute your strange claim.

    Mazda 6 2.2D 182 Sport has 182 BHP 0-60 8.3 secs
    Mazda 6 2.5 Sport (petrol) has 168 BHP 0-60 8.3 secs

    The power outputs may actually be in PS not BHP but that's not relevant to the comparison.

    The petrol also has a slightly higher top speed.

    I would expect that the diesel may be quicker from 40-60 or similar due to the amount of torque it develops though.
    It's my problem, it's my problem
    If I feel the need to hide
    And it's my problem if I have no friends
    And feel I want to die


  • pault123
    pault123 Posts: 1,111 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    Erm why would a 130bhp diesel engined car out-perform a 130bhp petrol engined car in a 0-60 race (presuming identical weights)?

    I didn't say it would out perform it, they will get similar 0-60' times - yet the diesel will win the torque race hands down. People tend to forget that it's torque and not brake horsepower that actually accelerates a car. Hence to match a 130bhp turbo diesels torque you need to get a higher rated 150bhp Petrol.

    Bill i'm just a lover or diesel torque on tap at low revs, something petrol will never offer me.
  • MrsE_2
    MrsE_2 Posts: 24,161 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker

    Why should we buy diesel cars?

    My DH does about 40k + per year, it works for him.

    I bought a petrol because I only do about 6k.
  • BillScarab
    BillScarab Posts: 6,027 Forumite
    pault123 wrote: »
    I didn't say it would out perform it, they will get similar 0-60' times - yet the diesel will win the torque race hands down. People tend to forget that it's torque and not brake horsepower that actually accelerates a car. Hence to match a 130bhp turbo diesels torque you need to get a higher rated 150bhp Petrol.

    Bill i'm just a lover or diesel torque on tap at low revs, something petrol will never offer me.

    I drive them myself, the driving characteristics are more similar to the old traditional 8v petrols I used to drive in my youth. I'm still deabting whether my next car will be petrol or diesel though, I'll need to do some serious number crunching to see if petrol would be better financially.
    It's my problem, it's my problem
    If I feel the need to hide
    And it's my problem if I have no friends
    And feel I want to die


  • pault123
    pault123 Posts: 1,111 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    BillScarab wrote: »
    I drive them myself, the driving characteristics are more similar to the old traditional 8v petrols I used to drive in my youth. I'm still deabting whether my next car will be petrol or diesel though, I'll need to do some serious number crunching to see if petrol would be better financially.

    Which engine do you have Bill?
  • DKLS
    DKLS Posts: 13,461 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    pault123 wrote: »
    I didn't say it would out perform it, they will get similar 0-60' times - yet the diesel will win the torque race hands down. People tend to forget that it's torque and not brake horsepower that actually accelerates a car. Hence to match a 130bhp turbo diesels torque you need to get a higher rated 150bhp Petrol.

    Bill i'm just a lover or diesel torque on tap at low revs, something petrol will never offer me.

    Pickup is fine on a diesel, but I have found there is sod all in the midrange and not much more at the top end.
    Moot point anyway for me, as the only diesel I enjoyed driving cost over 30k.

    Will stick with my 330bhp Petrol motor, fuel economy is on the poor side, But get paid mileage so I don't feel the pain.
  • pault123 wrote: »
    I didn't say it would out perform it, they will get similar 0-60' times - yet the diesel will win the torque race hands down. People tend to forget that it's torque and not brake horsepower that actually accelerates a car. Hence to match a 130bhp turbo diesels torque you need to get a higher rated 150bhp Petrol.

    Bill i'm just a lover or diesel torque on tap at low revs, something petrol will never offer me.

    Utter rubbish. You can have as much torque as you like, but it's horsepower that does the work, not torque. Dress it up however you like, but a 130bhp torquey diesel engine will never have as much power as a 131bhp petrol engine, and gearing aside it will never out-accelerate it, particularly as diesel engines tend to be heavier than their petrol counterparts.

    The attitude you're displaying is the typical "I've got a new TDi engine, it'll out-accelerate a Ferrari". You're very much deluded. Remember, while your 'King of Torque' engine runs out of steam at 4000rpm, the petrol varient will be accelerating right up to 6000rpm with a much wider power band, and it won't require a turbo either.

    For motorway trips, a diesel is usually a good choice - but for pure fun, it'll never ever be as good as a N/A petrol engine.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.