We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Brown 'very angry' about bonuses

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7878418.stm

Seems on top of the Barclays £600 million bonus payouts, RBS also have a reported £1 Billion in bonuses to pay out
Earlier Mr Brown said - amid reports the taxpayer-saved RBS group is to pay out £1bn in bonuses - the culture of rewarding failure was being ended.

So much for a credit crunch when these guys are reporting Billions of pounds in profit.
:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:
«134

Comments

  • Zagu
    Zagu Posts: 2,711 Forumite
    You'd have thought that one of the conditions of a bailout would have been a restriction on bonuses.
    "I'm not even supposed to be here today."
  • icefall
    icefall Posts: 1,125 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Its ridiculous :confused: makes no logical sense whatsoever.

    In any other industry, they would be accepting lower wages or doing more overtime etc but no its the banks so its different for them.
    I always wanted to be a procrastinator, never got round to it...
  • bo_drinker
    bo_drinker Posts: 3,924 Forumite
    Taking the p1ss big time. Less money in the pot for those that need some, I'm alright jack. I hope these scum rot.
    I came in to this world with nothing and I've still got most of it left. :rolleyes:
  • ajbell
    ajbell Posts: 1,151 Forumite
    I don't think barclays took any government money so i think its up to them.
    4kWp, South facing, 16 x phono solar panels, Solis inverter, Lincolnshire.
  • Alan_M_2
    Alan_M_2 Posts: 2,752 Forumite
    Barclays remain private, I understand they are, or will be paying through the nose to keep it that way.

    However they are free to pay whatever they wish to whoever they wish.

    Any institution which has absorbed taxpayers money is very unwise to pay anything classed as "Bonus" at the moment, it's simply a PR nightmare.
  • bo_drinker
    bo_drinker Posts: 3,924 Forumite
    Sorry I was referring to RBS. But it wouldn't hurt to refuse bonuses in these circumstances. Too much has been paid out in recent years, now look where we are.
    I came in to this world with nothing and I've still got most of it left. :rolleyes:
  • Conrad
    Conrad Posts: 33,137 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Why do we not hear of fat cat;

    Sting
    Bono
    McCartney (£800m - imagine the schools that would build)
    Kirsty (Newsnight - £400k Tax payers dosh for a few days consutancy on the Scottish parliament building


    Kieth 6 houses Vass
    Ben £50m Elton
    Shirley £800k pa Williams (ah, such a nice fluffy Liberal)
    Tony £3m Holland Park House Ben


    Are these people nicer than Bankers, or just competent at blind siding the public?
  • Heyman_2
    Heyman_2 Posts: 1,819 Forumite
    Why wasn't he 'very angry' about the Northern Rock bonuses back in January? Back then, his spokesman was quoted as saying 'Operational decisions such as this are a matter for Northern Rock'

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/northern-rock-staff-to-share-16388m-bonus-pool-1488769.html

    In this case, why isn't it an 'Operational decision for RBS' then? :confused:

    Surely they knew about this some time ago?? :confused:

    Or is it just more posturing and trying to pull the wool over people's eyes rather than actually coming clean and excerting a bit of authority given that the taxpayer is a MAJORITY shareholder!! :mad:
  • mr_angry.jpg


    So he should be. The rest of us are.

    I'm not sure all Barclays' shareholders are super-happy at the way the company has been run;
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/city-fury-over-terms-of-barclays-bailout-982269.html
    "it will raise £7.3bn from investors in Qatar and Abu Dhabi"
    "Under the plan, the bank is paying 14 per cent interest for 10 years on some of the preferred-like shares being used."


    Senior executives may have been involved in that sort of decision, and so rightly deserve no bonus, but there will also have been bad lower-level actions;

    "Analysts believe some £600m will be paid in bonuses at the group's investment banking arm, Barclays Capital. This is despite the fact the division would have been loss-making without the accounting benefit of the Lehman deal and was responsible for £8bn of credit crunch write-downs."
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/feb/09/barclay-banking


    Why do the "experts" who were around when the foundations of the credit crunch were being laid, need to be encouraged to stay around. Are the banks not better off without them?
  • Primrose
    Primrose Posts: 10,714 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've been Money Tipped!
    It's unthinkable that bankers in bailed out banks should still even be thinking about bonuses in the present climate. How deaf are they to public anger when every day more job losses are being announced? And to argue that some bonuses are "contractual" is rather ingenuous. With current high level of job losses in the financial industry any board of directors with any guts should be announcing that they were renegotiating all job contracts with built-in bonuses with immediate effect and tell employees, "you can either renegotiate your contract or feel free to walk and look for another job elsewhere". The banks keep saying that if they don't pay the bonuses, they will lose their best employees. Where will they all go to with virtually every financial institution reducing the number of employees they're hiring?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.