We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Moving savings to Egg Money card

Options
Hi, I have an old Egg Money credit card that pays 4% AER on positive balances. I'm considering moving my non-ISA savings on to this card as the rate is much better and it would avoid the hassle of opening another savings account. Does this seem like a good idea? The only draw back I can think of is that I don't know if I would be protected should Egg run into trouble

Thanks

Comments

  • Any purchases you make won't be protected under Section 75 while you have a positive balance.
    Conjugating the verb 'to be":
    -o I am humble -o You are attention seeking -o She is Nadine Dorries
  • YorkshireBoy
    YorkshireBoy Posts: 31,541 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    eltrot1979 wrote: »
    The only draw back I can think of is that I don't know if I would be protected should Egg run into trouble
    Since Egg allow you to 'deposit' funds onto the card, they are classed as a 'deposit taker' for the purposes of the £50K FSCS protection.
  • Milarky
    Milarky Posts: 6,356 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic
    Any purchases you make won't be protected under Section 75 while you have a positive balance.
    (Paul, I think we've had this argument before:)!)
    .....under construction.... COVID is a [discontinued] scam
  • What argument? There's nothing to 'argue' about.

    Given the opportunity to answer a clearly worded question, Egg clearly didn't state that they'd offer Sec.75 and instead 'it would depend [on the circumstances].' Sec.75 doesn't have such conditions.


    (Yes, they may, out of the goodness of their hearts, sometimes, offer compensation as if it was like Sec.75, but that doesn't mean Sec.75 applies.)
    Conjugating the verb 'to be":
    -o I am humble -o You are attention seeking -o She is Nadine Dorries
  • Thanks for all the replies!

    I've emailed Egg regarding the Section 75 question and I'll post the response once they reply.
  • Paul_Herring
    Paul_Herring Posts: 7,484 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    eltrot1979 wrote: »
    I've emailed Egg regarding the Section 75 question and I'll post the response once they reply.

    It'd be interesting to see if it's any different to the one I got off them (in the post linked above.)
    Conjugating the verb 'to be":
    -o I am humble -o You are attention seeking -o She is Nadine Dorries
  • Milarky
    Milarky Posts: 6,356 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic
    What argument? There's nothing to 'argue' about.

    Given the opportunity to answer a clearly worded question, Egg clearly didn't state that they'd offer Sec.75 and instead 'it would depend [on the circumstances].' Sec.75 doesn't have such conditions.
    No they didn't exactly cover themselves in glory:
    In your Secure Message dated 11 September 2008, you have asked if your Egg Money Card was in credit, would you still be covered under Section 75. I have today spoken to our Disputes Team who deals with these matters and they have confirmed it all depends on what you are claiming for and why. So I am sorry to inform you but I am unable to provide you with an exact answer to your question.
    That may simply be because Section 75 applies applies only in specific circumstances anyway. The answer, you'll note, doesn't say that it depends on the fact that the account may have a credit balance - simply what the transaction itself relates to.

    Furthermore, as quoted here it is stated that
    (4) This section [Section 75 CCA 1974, '[I]Liability of creditor for breaches by supplier[/I]'] applies notwithstanding that the debtor, in entering into the transaction, exceeded the credit limit or otherwise contravened any term of the agreement.
    Which, as I explained I thought meant that credit card companies cannot evade basic liability simply because someone has used a 'credit card' with a positive balance to pay for goods....
    .....under construction.... COVID is a [discontinued] scam
  • Here's the response from Egg:

    "You're still covered by the Consumer Credit Act on your Egg Money card if you are in a positive balance.

    If you withdraw cash from a positive balance there would be no charge, as long as the withdrawal doesn't send you into a debit balance."
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.