We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
My 4gb of ram is only showing as 2558mb
BaileyB
Posts: 2,281 Forumite
in Techie Stuff
Hi,
I'm on Vista 32 bit and had 4 gb of ram installed. I know the 32 bit had an issue of only seeing the 2.99gb. But the SP1 download covered this and i could see the 4gb.
I just installed a new graphics card and looked at the system details to see that my pc was only seeing 2558 of it. I took them out and put them back in but still the same.
If it was an issue with the 32 bit it would have gone back to 2.99gb and not 2.58gb. I have 4x1gb sticks installed so dont even know where the .58 has come from. (1024x2+512=2560)
Any ideas what could be causing this?
Thanks
I'm on Vista 32 bit and had 4 gb of ram installed. I know the 32 bit had an issue of only seeing the 2.99gb. But the SP1 download covered this and i could see the 4gb.
I just installed a new graphics card and looked at the system details to see that my pc was only seeing 2558 of it. I took them out and put them back in but still the same.
If it was an issue with the 32 bit it would have gone back to 2.99gb and not 2.58gb. I have 4x1gb sticks installed so dont even know where the .58 has come from. (1024x2+512=2560)
Any ideas what could be causing this?
Thanks
0
Comments
-
The graphic card memory will be using some of the visible 2.99GB I am guessing yo have a 512MB card?The only way of finding the limits of the possible is by going beyond them into the impossible.
Arthur C. Clarke0 -
^ +1

...
post too short
Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant.0 -
I agree. You could confirm that be playing about with them fitting 2 at a time.
There will always be a bit less anyway even taking into account the Graphics due to memory addressing0 -
Upon the subject of usable memory, you may find THIS helpful.
In particular, the paragraph entitled "The great PC RAM swindle".
But all of it is interesting. As, indeed, are the other articles in that series.
Don't laugh at banana republics. :rotfl:
As a result of how you voted in the last three General Elections,
you'd now be better off living in one.
0 -
Ah thats where its gone.
But any idea why the 4gb is not seen as that, i know the 32 bit could only see 3gb but the Sp1 download pack was to fix this.0 -
so the new 64 bit apple OS supports more than 4 gig...er as does vista64 (which is why I have 4 gig)
Was there a point in there somewhere (besides Dell sell E-peen)
You want a "great ram swindle" consider the cost of 4 gig of apple ram vs 4 gig of PC stuff
Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant.0 -
is your on board graphics chip using some of these memory resources?
Are your DDR Chips running in mirror or anything? ahve you installed matching pairs of sticks?0 -
Have a look in Control Panel => Performance Information and Tools => Advanced Tools => View Advanced system details in System Information
Or click RUN and type Msinfo32.exe
You should see your Installed RAM listed without all the overheads (4GB)0 -
DatabaseError wrote: »You want a "great ram swindle" consider the cost of 4 gig of apple ram vs 4 gig of PC stuff

There's no such thing as "Apple RAM" aside from RAM that is purchased from Apple (which you'd have to have more money than sense to do).0 -
DatabaseError wrote: »
so the new 64 bit apple OS supports more than 4 gig...er as does vista64 (which is why I have 4 gig)
Was there a point in there somewhere (besides Dell sell E-peen)
You want a "great ram swindle" consider the cost of 4 gig of apple ram vs 4 gig of PC stuff
I would commend to you reading the whole article properly and objectively. And the others in that series.
(Preferably over a pint of Sam Smith's :beer: )
I think you have missed the point being made in it in regard to the reporting of usable RAM.
No Mac user, incidentally, would buy RAM from Apple. We buy it from Crucial, like everyone else. :money:
Apple's quoted prices for RAM are just to assist Mac users making insurance claims on a new-for-old policy after an accident. Apple is kind like that.
Don't laugh at banana republics. :rotfl:
As a result of how you voted in the last three General Elections,
you'd now be better off living in one.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards