We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Getting a deposit back..

135

Comments

  • sooz
    sooz Posts: 4,560 Forumite
    Premier wrote: »
    I think you may possibly be being mis-led regarding the cost of the replacement carpet by the words "b^gger all" and "small token payment"

    It is true however that you will not be liable for the total cost as allowance must be made for existing wear & tear.
    However, there are some carpets that will be lucky to last 2 years whilst others last 20+ years.

    So you need to decide, in agreement with the LL, the original life expectancy of the carpet. Also required is how old it actually was.

    Let me explain by example.
    Lets assume for the sake of argument the carpet was cheap and so did only have a short life expectancy of 5 years. And lets assume the carpet was 2 years old. So if you hadn't damaged it, it would have been expected to last a further 3 years.

    On that basis, you would be expected to pay 60% of the cost of a replacement carpet of equal quality.

    If it had been a quality carpet, the LL could prove this (with the original receipt & spec) AND had conducted an ingoing inventory which the tenant had agreed & signed, then I would agree with you.

    I'd made an assumption that a LL who doesn't bother with an inventory is vey unlikely to have installed a good quality carpet - so 5 years is about the maximum life expectancy of a cheap one. However, the age & quality of the carpet is rather irrelevant in the OP's case, as no inventory was conducted.
  • poppysarah
    poppysarah Posts: 11,522 Forumite
    And you can have carpet tested for how many threads it has (they cut a sample from inside a cupboard or somewhere not noticeable) - if there's dispute.
  • Premier_2
    Premier_2 Posts: 15,141 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I don't think you should be describing it as hole, because everyone assumes some weird damage from unnatural usage; describe it as threadbare patch of wear and explain it was from normal usage....
    With all due respect, I've not seen the hole and nor have you. However, the OP has and I have used the same word as she used in her post#4
    owensmum75 wrote:
    ...He said he's waiting for a quote for a new front room carpet as we made a hole in it (which is true). ...
    "Now to trolling as a concept. .... Personally, I've always found it a little sad that people choose to spend such a large proportion of their lives in this way but they do, and we have to deal with it." - MSE Forum Manager 6th July 2010
  • Premier_2
    Premier_2 Posts: 15,141 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    sooz wrote: »
    ...I'd made an assumption that a LL who doesn't bother with an inventory is vey unlikely to have installed a good quality carpet - so 5 years is about the maximum life expectancy of a cheap one. However, the age & quality of the carpet is rather irrelevant in the OP's case, as no inventory was conducted.

    I feel sure the LL has a copy of the receipt for the carpet. It's needed for tax purposes.

    The lack of inventory is extremely important and could seriously go against the tenant in this matter. Without an agreed inventory/statement of condition (or other evidence) the LL is holding all the cards and the ex-tenant would have difficulty in proving otherwise.

    A court would have to assess any claim on the balance of probablity and if
    e.g. if the LL has a receipt showing a top quality carpet (one which may be reasonably expected to last 20+ years) was installed just before the tenancy started (which was 4 years ago), the the tenant could be left with paying 80%+ (16/20) of the price of a replacement carpet. :eek:


    Please, please, please, tenants, always insist on an inventory/statement of condition when starting & ending a tenancy - it's in as much interest of you as a tenant as it is of that of a LL.
    "Now to trolling as a concept. .... Personally, I've always found it a little sad that people choose to spend such a large proportion of their lives in this way but they do, and we have to deal with it." - MSE Forum Manager 6th July 2010
  • sooz
    sooz Posts: 4,560 Forumite
    Premier wrote: »
    I feel sure the LL has a copy of the receipt for the carpet. It's needed for tax purposes.

    The lack of inventory is extremely important and could seriously go against the tenant in this matter. Without an agreed inventory/statement of condition (or other evidence) the LL is holding all the cards and the ex-tenant would have difficulty in proving otherwise.

    A court would have to assess any claim on the balance of probablity and if
    e.g. if the LL has a receipt showing a top quality carpet (one which may be reasonably expected to last 20+ years) was installed just before the tenancy started (which was 4 years ago), the the tenant could be left with paying 80%+ (16/20) of the price of a replacement carpet. :eek:


    surely the tenant would be holding all the cards? the LL may produce a receipt showing that the carpet was of the finest quality, but has no proof of what state it was in at the time when the OP moved in. The previous tenants may have been chain smoking motorbike repair enthusiasts, 6 large dogs & with agoraphobia :D Unless the receipt was dated on or very near the day the tenants actually moved in.
  • tbs624
    tbs624 Posts: 10,816 Forumite
    quote=owensmum75;18151911] Well, I've heard back from my landlord. From the tone of his letter I don't think we're going to see our deposit again!
    He said we left the house needing extensive cleaning (my parents cleaned the day we moved out), that there is a flea infestation (I have two cats but I think I would have noticed an infestation), that the back garden needed several trips to the tip to clear up (we admit we didn't tidy the garden but at most it would have been 2 trips).[/quote]


    You can only be asked to return the property in the same condition as let to you, fair wear & tear excluded. As Sooz says, the fact that there was no inventory weakens the LL’s case. In the interests of fairness,however, perhaps you should make an offer on the garden clearance - it is a general requirement of most tenancy agreements that you will keep/return a garden in a “tidy” condition.

    Had the LL agreed to the cats being in the property and if yes, were any special conditions attached to the tenancy agreement? Check what the local council would charge for a treatment for that size property & accept that you may have to cough up for that one.
    owensmum75 wrote: »
    He asked us to move out because he couldn't afford to keep the house given the current climate.The day after we moved out he moved in the neighbours son and daughter in law.
    If you were on a periodic agreement unfortunately the LL doesn't have to give any reason for giving you notice.
    owensmum75 wrote: »
    He paid them £150 to clean the house which he is taking out of our deposit and is claiming that there is still a lot of cleaning to be done.
    He can’t just randomly pick a figure for cleaning, especially if he has nothing to show the condition of the property at the start.
    owensmum75 wrote: »
    Bearing in mind we moved out in November. I'm not sure what to do. He said he's waiting for a quote for a new front room carpet as we made a hole in it (which is true). Can I ask for copies of quotes?
    Agree with BBear and Sooz on the carpets - I would argue FW&T on that one and leave him to prove otherwise.
    owensmum75 wrote: »
    If the property was that bad why did he move someone straight in? When we moved to our new house he had to provide a reference as to our suitability as tenants. He stated we left the property in a good state so why is he now coming up with problems?
    Do you still have a copy of this reference?
    owensmum75 wrote: »
    As an aside to all this, he left us twice without heating and hot water for a total of 12 days with an infant who suffers with eczema and needs frequent baths but didn't once offer to compensate us. The front room windows leaked like a tap when it rained, a problem I constantly told him about but he did nothing. The back room window didn't shut properly so was always drafty, something I mentioned on many occasions.
    Any T should always log repairs issues in writing to the LL/LA at the earliest opportunity so that there is a clear paper trail - the problem is that often Ts put up with things during the tenancy, don't have proof and then bring it all up when there is a deposit return issue. The two issues are separate.

    Given that you moved out in November & you've still not had resolve it’s time to make him an offer in writing for the bits you may feel are warranted and to ask for the return of the balance within the next 7 working days. If he doesn’t agree then you have the option to pursue the matter through the small claims court.
  • Can anyone help with letter writing? I'm no good at stuff like this!
  • Premier_2
    Premier_2 Posts: 15,141 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    sooz wrote: »
    ... Unless the receipt was dated on or very near the day the tenants actually moved in.

    You mean like:
    Premier wrote:
    ...A court would have to assess any claim on the balance of probablity and if e.g. if the LL has a receipt showing a top quality carpet (one which may be reasonably expected to last 20+ years) was installed just before the tenancy started (which was 4 years ago), the the tenant could be left with paying 80%+ (16/20) of the price of a replacement carpet. :eek:
    ;)
    "Now to trolling as a concept. .... Personally, I've always found it a little sad that people choose to spend such a large proportion of their lives in this way but they do, and we have to deal with it." - MSE Forum Manager 6th July 2010
  • tbs624
    tbs624 Posts: 10,816 Forumite
    owensmum75 wrote: »
    Can anyone help with letter writing? I'm no good at stuff like this!
    have sent a PM :smiley:
  • Well the letter has been sent. He should have got it today.....:eek:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.