We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Have any of you lost 3st or a bit less and NOT
Comments
-
i have 6 stone to lose, but am SO afraid of having baggy skin. i'm 24 and i'd prefer to be fat than thin with disgusting saggy skin!
i put a lot of weight on quickly (main percentage down to health problems) and have stretch marks everywhere. i don't think it's physically possible for scarred skin to retract, so i'm very worried about having saggy skin in these areas.Debt @ LBM 29/12/08 - £49044! Now £44684.Fat loss 29/85lbs // £100 into £10k £243.07/£10kHSBC Loan 9658 // HSBC CC 3484 // HSBC CC 1464 // DP's 779 // Car 0% 4851 // Halifax OD 1348 // HSBC OD 1.5k // HSBC OD 1k // Barclays OD 400 // IOMOM 4400 // S Loan 15k // Cap1 £8000 -
no u wont lose all your stretch marks tho some people have said bio oil is good for them... also u are still fairly young so it should be easier for your skin to readjust
as i said before i have lost 8stone (all in my 40's) and i dont have saggy skin, lose it slowly look after your skin, do some conditioning exercise..maybe be happy with losing 4 or 5 stone instead of 6... it can take up to a year i belive for your skin to readjust so dont give up and good luck in your weight loss
xWhen you know better you do better0 -
Oh and a note about VLCDs. I struggled with them for over a year, they work in the short term but the reason why I got so fat was because I love food. At the end of the day all a VLCD does is deny you the food that you need so I decided to stop making myself miserable and eat while loosing weight through exercise.
Utter, utter tosh. :rolleyes:
Unless you're an athlete you don't need anywhere near the level of carbs that the average person eats these days.0 -
tinkerbell84 wrote: »Utter, utter tosh. :rolleyes:
Unless you're an athlete you don't need anywhere near the level of carbs that the average person eats these days.
I think that VLCD stands for Very Low Calorie Diet - completely the opposite of a healthy Low Carb way of eating!
I have shed almost 4 stone over the past 6-7 months on a healthy, low-carb diet of abundance (loads of fresh veg, fish, organic meat and eggs, fresh fruit). That brought me down from the obese BMI category to just overweight. I have another 2 st to go until I reach the healthy BMI range. At present, I have no loose skin (but that's possibly because I still have some fat under it, as well as toned muscles!). I exercise moderately, eat plenty of healthy fats (oily fish, avocadoes, nuts and seeds, olive oil) to lubricate my skin from the inside, and use body butter/massage bars/oils on my tummy skin. [I carried most of the excess weight in that area, a typical apple shape.] Oh, and I'm 38.
HTH!Cogito, ergo sum.0 -
tinkerbell84 wrote: »Utter, utter tosh. :rolleyes:
Unless you're an athlete you don't need anywhere near the level of carbs that the average person eats these days.
Not tosh at all - VLCD means Very Low Calorie Diet - not Very low CARB Diet. They work for some people but in general they just create a binge/starve cycle that makes 99.9% of the people who do them gain all the weight back that they lost.There are many things in life that will catch your eye, only a few will catch your heart. Pursue those.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards