We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

New pole and boxes at edge of our estate

2»

Comments

  • fwor
    fwor Posts: 6,880 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Uh? I thought that the mobile phone companies paid for the mobile phone masts. Won't it be their customers that pay for it?

    BTW, does anyone have a quick link to the 21CN rollout by exchange? Would be interested to see when we'll get it...
  • savemoney
    savemoney Posts: 18,125 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    http://www.samknows.com/broadband/checker2.php
    fwor wrote: »
    Uh? I thought that the mobile phone companies paid for the mobile phone masts. Won't it be their customers that pay for it?

    BTW, does anyone have a quick link to the 21CN rollout by exchange? Would be interested to see when we'll get it...
  • oldwiring
    oldwiring Posts: 2,452 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
  • fwor
    fwor Posts: 6,880 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    There's nothing wrong with being defiant about it.

    And I thought the drawing was excellent - no unnecessary detail to distract from the outline.

    Not sure why you think the shareholders will be the ones to pay - are they going to write to them and ask for a whip round?

    If it is in fact a mobile phone mast, it's more likely the mobile phone co. management will decide where and how to recover the costs. A proportion may come from paying customers, a proportion might come from reducing dividend payments to shareholders.
  • savemoney
    savemoney Posts: 18,125 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    They may also recoup money selling space on masts to other operators
  • Leopard wrote: »

    (And CoveredInBees thought it was "defiantly" one.)
    You have had a pop at me in 2 threads now !!!!!! have I done to upset you
    Nothing to see here, move along.
  • fwor
    fwor Posts: 6,880 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Leopard wrote: »
    Might not be a good idea to consider a new career as a financial journalist (however defiantly). :rolleyes:

    I don't claim to be a financial expert. But the two main ways in which shareholders ~could~ pay are either via share price or dividend. Both are determined by a complex mix of factors, and won't be directly linked to any individual cost item - such as the building of a new mast.

    Perhaps you can provide a coherent explanation of your statement that "shareholders will pay for it"?

    I doubt you will.
  • fwor
    fwor Posts: 6,880 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The value of a shareholder's investment cannot be directly linked to any individual cost item. It (the share price) is based on an aggregate of factors, including both income and costs, among many others.

    Feel free to have the last word - I know you want to.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.