We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
I hate you Northerners.
Comments
-
jamescredmond wrote: »ultimately, the 'poll of polls' and 'exit poll' measurements have demonstrated high levels of accuracy since '87.
er.. sorry...gone off-post again.....
Apart from the 1992 general election of course.
Daniel Finkelstein in The Times is excellent on polls and psephology.0 -
jamescredmond wrote: »strange as it may sound, the accuracy of UK psephologists (populus, etc)has steadily improved over the past 20+ yrs, as their questioning techniques have become more refined.
from a poll-buyers point of view (papers, tv channels, etc) this is just as well, because commisioning a poll is pricey.
however, some 'rogue' polls still get through.
ultimately, the 'poll of polls' and 'exit poll' measurements have demonstrated high levels of accuracy since '87.
er.. sorry...gone off-post again.....
Still not as accurate as the election result though.;)0 -
ah yes. I o/looked 92. but broadly speaking...........Apart from the 1992 general election of course.
Daniel Finkelstein in The Times is excellent on polls and psephology.
I also forget tory 'policy wonk' danny.
still, you'll have to agree on the improved efficiency. right, gen?miladdo0 -
jamescredmond wrote: »ah yes. I o/looked 92. but broadly speaking...........
I also forget tory 'policy wonk' danny.
still, you'll have to agree on the improved efficiency. right, gen?
I do agree JC old thing.0 -
The real crisis hasnt been shown yet.
Even the desperate sellers are still holding out for prices that are not down all that much.
Next year we will see 50% drops average, and the real desperate ones down more.0 -
The real crisis hasnt been shown yet.
Even the desperate sellers are still holding out for prices that are not down all that much.
Next year we will see 50% drops average, and the real desperate ones down more.
You think prices are going to fall by 5% per month next year for the year? Seems a little punchy.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards